Search for: "Love v. United States"
Results 2141 - 2160
of 3,302
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2009, 2:53 pm
The LSC argued it was, citing R (Corner House Research) v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry [2005] EWCA Civ 192 and, of course, Weaver v London Quadrant Housing Trust [2009] EWCA Civ 235 (our report here). [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 5:33 am
Code of Civil Procedure section 2094 states as follows: (a) An oath, affirmation, or declaration in an action or a proceeding, may be administered by obtaining an affirmative response to one of the following questions: (1) “Do you solemnly state that the evidence you shall give in this issue (or matter) shall be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God? [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 2:51 am
See United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 9:03 am
And until Kiobel, corporations headquartered or doing business in the United States have always been liable, as well. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 9:03 am
And until Kiobel, corporations headquartered or doing business in the United States have always been liable, as well. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 2:06 pm
As Justice McReynolds famously said in Pierce v Society of Sisters 268 US 510 (1925), at 535, “The child is not the mere creature of the State”. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 11:02 am
Of course, it was Senator James Buckley — or, as the Supreme Court described him, “a minor-party candidate in 1970 when he was elected to the United States Senate from the State of New York. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 4:00 am
To understand the Court’s ruling, let’s take a look at the case of Carolyn Jobe v. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 3:30 am
Yes, according to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
21 Aug 2016, 9:02 am
In that case, plaintiff worked on boilers as a technician for the United States Navy for all of the 1960s and most of the 1970s. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 11:02 am
Of course, it was Senator James Buckley — or, as the Supreme Court described him, “a minor-party candidate in 1970 when he was elected to the United States Senate from the State of New York. [read post]
12 May 2011, 11:23 am
As a result, if the Supreme Court adopts the activity/inactivity distinction, it seems likely that future Congresses will use whatever hook the Supreme Court says is required — and not one iota more — to make sure their laws pass judicial muster.We saw this with Congress’s reaction to United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 3:30 am
I’d love to hear from you. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 11:43 am
This particular claimant worked for the state police as a videographer. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 6:12 pm
Virginia State Bar, 421 US 773 (1975), that the United States Supreme Court found that a bar requirement that attorneys charge clients a minimum flat fee for certain work was unconstitutional. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 2:03 pm
However, today's decision in Case T-526/09 PAKI Logistics GmbH v OHIM; soutenu par Royaume-Uni de Grande-Bretagne et d’Irlande du Nord -- available only in French and German so far -- has drummed up a lot of activity in the general vicinity of the Kat's email in-box, spearheaded by the articulate and erudite Simon Malynicz (3 New Square) who appeared for the Royaume-Uni [Merpel explains: the United Kingdom has been rebranded 'Royaume-Uni' in a… [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 9:54 am
To recollect that love story, read our post here. [read post]
5 May 2017, 3:00 am
” Machin v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 7:08 am
He was 89.Judge Pollak, who served on the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, was widely regarded as one of the leading members of the judiciary in the country. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 10:23 am
My grandson loves Grand Theft Auto, or at least he used to. [read post]
