Search for: "The People v. Cross"
Results 2141 - 2160
of 5,463
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2018, 11:43 am
This is likely to be welcomed as most people had struggled to interpret the Judge's one set of terms position in a way which fitted in with commercial arms' length negotiations of complex licences. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 10:13 am
Case Citation: People v. [read post]
16 Jan 2022, 7:02 pm
Nor are they tested by cross-examination. [read post]
30 May 2013, 8:16 pm
Google filed its brief in the cross-appeal of the Oracle v. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 5:02 am
Chindarah v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 1:31 am
Shocking and offending people is sometimes a necessary part of effective protest. [read post]
3 May 2019, 4:06 pm
Three people were charged under USA law, although Dr Chau was not one of them. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 6:38 am
Black (2003) In this case, three men contested a Virginia law that made burning a cross a crime on its own, without unmistakable evidence that the act was made to intimidate people. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 5:01 am
From State v. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 2:29 pm
People who identify as “feeling like the opposite sex” or “somewhere in between” do not comprise a third sex. [read post]
6 May 2015, 2:21 pm
Dampier v. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 4:06 am
The academics saw a line that could not be crossed, no matter what the reason, what the motive. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 4:26 pm
The NSW Court of Appeal has heard the appeal and cross appeal in the case of Chris Gayle v Fairfax Media. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 5:01 am
It’s understandable that people would think that the reduction in taxable income generated by the dependency exemption deduction reduces taxes. [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 9:30 am
The Supreme Court recently heard its first big Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) case, United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 10:55 am
Though not a bike lighting case, the First District Appellate Court (Chicago is in the First District) considered this issue in Savage v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 12:16 pm
A Few Thoughts This is a pretty fascinating case, as it implicates a cross-section of two developing doctrines: Search incident to arrest for cars, recently changed by Arizona v. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 3:01 pm
Thomas and Justice Amy Coney Barrett highlighted the abuse-of-discretion standard in People v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
Supreme Court, January 07, 2008 Arave v. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 3:32 pm
Today, in the case challenging the constitutionality of Proposition 8 (Perry v. [read post]
