Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 2161 - 2180
of 6,451
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2014, 9:18 am
The decision in Burrage v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 8:51 am
Since 2002 there had been extensive litigation in Canada and the United States arising from a contractual dispute between the two groups. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 10:14 am
That provision states that "the Court of Appeal will seek to take into account the fact that a case was in the Shorter Trials Scheme... [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 4:00 am
At first instance, it had consisted of the public in the EU Member States with English as an official language, Ireland and Malta, who could be characterised as displaying an average level of attention when selecting their preferred products. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 10:53 pm
Becerra v. [read post]
31 May 2009, 12:54 pm
Gentry v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 4:50 am
The Eleventh Circuit ruled in United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 5:11 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 5:37 pm
Luis V. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 6:00 pm
English) influence. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 6:21 am
by Dennis Crouch Oil States Energy Services, LLC, v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 2:50 am
The abuse of law test is whether the sole purpose of joining a defendant is to sue them other than in their Member State of domicile. [read post]
27 May 2011, 7:20 am
The attorney was charged with obstruction and making false statements related to a Food and Drug Administration investigation into drug promotions (United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 3:40 am
Answer: No, according to the English High Court[3]. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 8:12 am
MGFB Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 8:24 am
While use of a mark does not necessarily translate into that mark becoming distinctive of the user, in the absence of any other candidate mark by which consumers might identify the origin of the goods or services, the substantial use of a mark is a good start to proving that it has acquired distinctiveness.This evidence related to use and distinctiveness of the marks in the UK and the judge was therefore satisfied that by 19 May 2014, when Sofaworks filed its counterclaim for invalidity, the mark… [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 1:00 am
Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
15 May 2023, 3:55 am
Section V reviews an anti-bribery statute enacted by the first Congress. [read post]
5 May 2024, 8:32 am
Over to the team to report on Edwards Lifesciences v Meril GmbH and Meril Life Sciences (UPC_CFI_249/2023:"The Edwards Lifesciences v Meril preliminary injunction (PI) proceedings at the UPC on EP 3 763 331 protecting a “Prosthetic valve crimping device” (see here) started with a bang (or should this UPCKat say, crimp?) [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 7:00 pm
Lartigue v. [read post]
