Search for: "K. K. B., In re"
Results 2161 - 2180
of 2,384
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
Rep. 909 (K. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
[27] One main factor of consideration is whether or not the foreign manufacturer has assigned United States trademark rights and their registration to the designated exclusive United States importer.[28] United States and international antitrust and free competition policies intersect with trademark law in that the designated United States importer is usually concerned with gray market goods because they are sold for less, undercutting the designated United States importer's national price… [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 6:05 am
See, e.g., In re Welding Fume Prods. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 9:03 am
He is, after all, the lawyer who argued so famously in court that B. [read post]
10 Jun 2017, 9:32 am
Reid, Jennifer B. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 8:59 am
In Section Five of the order, Defendant provided the following reasoning in support of keeping bars closed: [B]y their very nature, [bars] present greater risks of the spread of COVID-19. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
EPO to make IPscore available for free (BLOG@IPJUR::COM) Help from the OHIM: CTM e-filing: program compatibility issues (Class 46) European qualifying examinations (EQEs) and languages (IPKat) Applications for geographical indications (GI) and protected designation of origins: BŘEZNICKÝ LEŽÁK, for Czech beer(GI) ; HAJDÚSÁGI TORMA, for Hungarian horseradish (PDO); Faba de Lourenzá for Spanish beans (GI);… [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
”[71] Justice Arbour noted that, in explaining the standard to a jury, it might be preferable to re-word the standard of causation using positive terms, for example, a phrase such as a “‘significant contributing cause’ rather than using expressions phrased in the negative such as ‘not a trivial cause’ or ‘not insignificant’. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
As a practical matter, the burden shifts to the party that wishes to challenge the relied upon facts and data to learn more about the cited studies to show that the facts and data are not sufficient under Rule 702(b), and that the testimony is not the product of reliable methods under Rule 702(c). [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 1:40 pm
Answering machines were relegated to Seinfeld re-runs. [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 3:47 pm
For additional information, please contact Heather K. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Today, for reasons both technological and political, there is an increasing divergence and growing conflict between U.S. and foreign laws that compel, and prohibit, production of data in response to governmental surveillance directives.[1][2] Major U.S. telecommunications and Internet providers[3] face escalating pressure from foreign governments, asserting foreign law, to require production of data stored by the providers in the United States, in ways that violate U.S. law.[4] At the… [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 2:17 pm
Clocktower Law LLC (Clocktower) conducts conflict-of-interest checks for each new client. b. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 12:09 pm
Kimball, David B. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 3:02 pm
Sustenta que no RE 631102 o STF decidiu que a alínea “k” do artigo 1º da LC nº 64, introduzida pela LC nº 135/2010, teria aplicação às eleições de 2010 e, sendo a decisão anterior, deve ter aplicação ao caso concreto. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am
Kirk Baert has kindly permitted us to post his Application to the Supreme Court of Canada for leave to appeal the Ontario Court of Appeal’s decision in Smith v. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 8:49 am
As we look back on 2013 and head into the second part of the two-year Congress, we’re poised for significant gains on several priorities. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:50 am
” In re Tyrone Noling, 2011 U.S. [read post]
1 Jun 2014, 11:30 pm
Auch gehöre ein Dokumentenlieferdienst nicht zu den Kernaufgaben einer Bibliothek und das Informationsinteresse der Öffentlichkeit sei nicht gefährdet. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 11:44 am
La declaración de Presidente Electo de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos, una vez analizado si el candidato que obtuvo el mayor número de votos, reúne los requisitos de elegibilidad a que se refieren los artículos 82 y 83 de la Constitución.[4] Con esta resolución concluye, asimismo, el proceso electoral federal. [read post]
