Search for: "Loving v. United States"
Results 2161 - 2180
of 3,272
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2020, 6:02 am
Before Brown v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 7:17 am
His appeals took the case to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 11:11 am
Sharp and the Supreme Court’s 1967 opinion in Loving v. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 7:07 am
Loving v. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 4:07 am
” Briefly: At the National Conference of State Legislatures’ blog, Lisa Soronen discusses District of Columbia v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 2:35 pm
As Perez put it, “I took an oath to enforce the Constitution and the law of the United States. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 7:07 am
Loving v. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 8:15 am
Hobby Lobby Stores Bush v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:17 am
Now all really is fair in love and war. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 2:21 pm
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit’s decision on September 9, 2010, in United States v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:20 pm
Reno) challenging a provision of the Communications Decency Act (CDA) which was ultimately heard by the United States Supreme Court, we had also filed an amicus curiae brief in support of the ACLU in another CDA challenge before the Supreme Court, Reno v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 4:00 pm
United States, which upheld mandatory minimums against an Apprendi challenge. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 9:23 am
The United States Supreme Court enunciated this presumption in Troxel v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 1:31 pm
We would love to include you! [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:09 pm
Massachusetts was the first state in the United States to allow same-sex marriage with the Goodridge v. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 6:30 am
After losing before the New Jersey Supreme Court, Princeton appealed to the United States Supreme Court with an absurd argument that their institutional First Amendment rights were violated by requiring that it allow people like my client on campus. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 8:32 am
Precision IBC, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:40 pm
” Nearly 100 years later in Loving v. [read post]
3 Sep 2016, 4:15 am
’s foundational premise of heterosexual parenting and nonrecognition of same-sex couples is unsustainable, particularly in light of the enactment of same-sex marriage in New York State, and the United States Supreme Court’s holding in Obergefell v Hodges (576 US __, 135 S Ct 2584 [2015]), which noted that the right to marry provides benefits not only for same-sex couples, but also the children being raised by those couples. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:00 pm
Pfizer Inc., 867 N.Y.S.2d 425 (N.Y.A.D. 2008) (state appellate holding that plaintiff's home state controls on choice of law; similar to, but much better than, Desiano); (15) Vanderwerf v. [read post]
