Search for: "People v Cooper" Results 2161 - 2180 of 2,878
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2008, 5:48 am
Al Arian before the very Alexandria grand jury that the Tampa prosecutor said had been covered by the "no grand jury cooperation" agreement. [read post]
I believe our chief executive and her team, our press officers, have done enormously well in public outreach and I think we now have over 100,000 people a year coming through the door. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am by Graham Smith
Citations in the post are to that list and to paragraph numbers in the Communication.Index to Issues and AnnexPresumed illegalDue process at sourceLegal competence v practical competenceDue process v quality standardsManifest illegality v contextual informationIllegality on the face of the statute v prosecutorial discretionOffline v onlineMore is better, faster is bestLiability shield v removal toolNational laws v coherent EU… [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  To a political scientist, one way is by viewing it as a power play by the rabbinate, an attempt many centuries before the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cooper v Aaron to engage in a performative utterance establishing themselves as the “ultimate interpreters” of the document in question, whether the Torah or the Constitution. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:17 am
  The object remains the same, inflaming passions, or in the drier language of the administrator of the engagement of the (voting or focus group relevant) masses might say, to lead people to an appropriate understanding of events and their implications. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 5:01 am by Rebecca Tushnet
We wouldn’t get involved in the science, ex post v. ex ante and that sort of thing. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 7:02 am by Rebecca Tushnet
(Terminology: not indigenous people but local culture: Carribean nations, Kenyans say: we don’t have indigenous people, but we do have local culture.) [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 1:33 pm by Alex R. McQuade
The U.K. would be safer, they argued, because it would no longer be subject to the EU requirement of free movement of people. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), Daiichi’s open offer for 20% in Ranbaxy awaits Sebi nod: (GenericsWeb), Australia/India: Strides shows thumbs up for Indian generic industry acquiring controlling interest in Ascent: (Spicy IP), Europe: Significant date ahead for EU Paediatric Regulation: (SPC Blog), India: Grave diggers, ‘immoral’ patent and the National Biotech Regulatory Authority: (Spicy IP), UK: Monster trade mark infringement case: court reveals its thinking… [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 10:50 am by Jacquelyn Greene
The court also discusses the United State Supreme Court’s holding in J.D.B. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 2:55 pm by Mark Murakami
  (a)  Because of the existing and increasing possibility of the occurrence of disasters or emergencies of unprecedented size and destructiveness resulting from natural or man-made hazards, and in order to ensure that the preparations of this State will be adequate to deal with such disasters or emergencies; to ensure the administration of state and federal programs providing disaster relief to individuals; and generally to protect the public health, safety, and welfare and to preserve the… [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 5:22 pm
Many people have heard of the X-Prize, a recent and high-profile example of a prize competition like the one Sen. [read post]