Search for: "People v. Stephens"
Results 2161 - 2180
of 2,666
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2022, 11:35 am
See, e.g., Stephen P. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 12:49 pm
“Hmm”, mused Merpel, “the lengths which some people will go to in order to secure the referee of their choice never ceases to amaze. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 3:27 am
To paraphrase Lord Atkin in United Australia v Barclays Bank[7], today, when the ghost of Mallet stands in the path of a just and equitable outcome, clanking its gender biased chains, the proper course for a judge is to pass through it undeterred. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 6:00 am
This question—and the case behind it, McCreary County v. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 3:15 pm
See, of course, CCH Canadian Ltd. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
State v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Major Philosophers Most Often Cited …it is not for the judiciary to permit the doctrine of utilitarianism to be used as a makeweight in the scales of justice…Stephens v. [read post]
18 Aug 2024, 6:30 am
One is the cultural power of alternatives to the liberal tradition, most notably the civic republicanism emphasized by Gordon Wood and others.[3] Agrarian debt relief resonated strongly with several strands of the republican tradition: the virtue of the yeoman farmer, the necessity of an economically independent citizenry, the state’s capacious powers to provide for the people’s welfare.[4] Republican ideology both valorized farmers as particularly deserving citizens and… [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), Daiichi’s open offer for 20% in Ranbaxy awaits Sebi nod: (GenericsWeb), Australia/India: Strides shows thumbs up for Indian generic industry acquiring controlling interest in Ascent: (Spicy IP), Europe: Significant date ahead for EU Paediatric Regulation: (SPC Blog), India: Grave diggers, ‘immoral’ patent and the National Biotech Regulatory Authority: (Spicy IP), UK: Monster trade mark infringement case: court reveals its thinking… [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 2:07 pm
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 10:41 am
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
13 Aug 2007, 11:47 pm
"A kid in the wrong place at the wrong time with the wrong people can end up being sentenced to death. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 6:19 pm
Conversely, productive property owned or controlled by individuals, especially where that ownership is not under state control or direction, could be understood as a challenge to the unity of the people and a political threat. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 1:08 pm
It does not, in our view, affect the substance of Article 25, which is concerned with universal franchise and the free expression of the people in the choice of legislature. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 12:48 pm
For example, in Whitney v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
States have justified their constitutional critiques of federal actions by claiming for themselves the role of representatives of the American people, or at least, a considerable proportion of that people. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 11:29 am
Judge Stephen Williams, concurring in the D.C. [read post]
10 May 2019, 6:30 am
"Put these three cycles together, and it is no wonder that people despair for American democracy," Balkin says near the end of the book. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 11:04 am
Adopted in 1984 in Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 7:56 am
Wuerth notes that in the 2015 case of Sachs v. [read post]
