Search for: "Simon v. Simon" Results 2161 - 2180 of 2,438
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2015, 4:00 am by Ian Mackenzie
The Supreme Court of Canada decided in 2013 that a judge could largely copy from the parties’ submissions in his reasons: Cojocaru v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 9:46 pm by Ken
I've written about it here: anti-vax lawyer Clifford Shoemaker's legal harassment of Neurodiversity blogger Kathleen Seidel, the British Chiropractic Association's failed crusade against Simon Singh, naturopath Christopher Maloney's feckless SLAPP threat against blogger Michael Hawkins, and even Marc Stephens lawyer-posing against critics of the Burzynski Clinic. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 10:09 pm
This was followed by Dan Simon, presenting a nice survey experiment (done with Doug Stenstrom and Steven J. [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:01 am by Doriane Coleman
This was already the question in 1996 when [Ruth Bader] Ginsburg penned the majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 5:28 pm by INFORRM
 The trial judge in Campbell v MGN was Mr Justice Morland since retired and in Douglas v Hello! [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 5:09 am by charonqc
British Chiropractic Association v Dr Singh [2010] EWCA Civ 350 The Guardian reported: “The science writer Simon Singh has won his court of appeal battle for the right to rely on the defence of fair comment in a libel action. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 4:53 am by INFORRM
Mulcaire alone pleaded guilty to five further substantive counts in respect of Max Clifford, Andrew Skylet, Gordon Taylor, Simon Hughes and Elle MacPherson. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 11:21 pm by Frank Cranmer
The most recent example is the Grand Chamber case of S, V and A v Denmark [GC], nos. 35553/12 and 2 others, 22 October 2018. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 5:00 am by IP Dragon
She illustrated this with the Octopus Card Limited v ODD.HK Limited case.The conflict was about the validity of two short-term patents registered in the name of ODD.HK Limited. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The case  of Verein für Konsumenteninformation  v. [read post]