Search for: "State v. Hazard"
Results 2161 - 2180
of 3,318
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2007, 12:48 am
United States, 17 F.3d 890, 901 (6th Cir. 1994); Albrecht v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 4:00 am
The case of Sassower v. 975 Stewart Avenue Associates, LLC is fast approaching poster-child status as an illustration of the headaches that can follow from poorly drafted valuation criteria in the buy-sell provision of a shareholders' or operating agreement. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 4:43 am
Mason v. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 4:20 am
The purposes of this privilege are to further the truth-seeking process at trial and encourage cooperation of witnesses, particularly with regard to expert witnesses, so that they can discharge their public duty freely “with knowledge that they will be insulated from the harassment and financial hazard of subsequent litigation” (Tolisano v Texon, 144 AD2d 267, 271 [1988, Smith, J., dissenting], revd for reasons stated in dissent 75 NY2d 732… [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 5:22 pm
Osmose, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 11:18 am
” See Greer v. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
TOXIC BURDENS AND STATE RESPONSIBILITY In the 1980s, the concept of environmental inequality emerged to stand for the simple premise that environmental degradation does not affect everyone equally. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 9:33 am
Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, 2017 WL 3784247 (Cal.Super.) citing Kugler v. [read post]
20 Oct 2006, 1:49 pm
Neighborhood Ass'n of the Back Bay, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2024, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s recent holding in Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) v. [read post]
3 Jan 2025, 6:50 am
And any reference to the State should be construed to mean State/Plaintiff or Defendant. [read post]
3 May 2022, 2:00 am
Hartmann v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 9:44 am
Closing loopholes that prevented common-sense and protective regulations in the past, LCSA gave the EPA additional authority to regulate hazardous chemicals like asbestos. [read post]
3 May 2022, 2:00 am
Hartmann v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 11:05 am
EPA, 14-49, all of which challenge the EPA’s authority to regulate purportedly hazardous emissions of electric utilities without invoking the unimpeachable method of cost-benefit analysis. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
Selikoff diverted regulatory attention from asbestos fiber type, with the result that the OSHA PELs were lowered for both chrysotile and amphibole asbestos, thus leaving the ultra-hazardous crocidolite asbestos in use. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 11:42 am
Harvey said the following with respect to fault when a motorist rear ends another in British Columbia: [15] All of the cases referred to me by counsel note that there is a high onus on a following driver, as stated in Molson v. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 1:17 pm
In our view, Local Law No. 3 was consistent with the Village’s comprehensive plan and was “calculated to benefit the community as a whole as opposed to benefitting individuals or a group of individuals” (Asian Ams. for Equality v Koch, 72 NY2d at 131; see Daniels v Van Voris, 241 AD2d 796, 798 [1997]). [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 1:17 pm
In our view, Local Law No. 3 was consistent with the Village’s comprehensive plan and was “calculated to benefit the community as a whole as opposed to benefitting individuals or a group of individuals” (Asian Ams. for Equality v Koch, 72 NY2d at 131; see Daniels v Van Voris, 241 AD2d 796, 798 [1997]). [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 6:58 pm
The Second Circuit’s recent panel opinion in Kiobel v. [read post]
