Search for: "State v. Items of Property"
Results 2161 - 2180
of 2,964
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2015, 5:54 am
” This means if you click on the link and purchase the item, I will receive an affiliate commission. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 5:02 am
"The first clause has prompted some to wonder whether Madison knew of Donaldson v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 7:56 am
The style of the case is, State Farm Fire & Casualty Company v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 10:09 am
Stewart v Seward (2007) 148 CA4th 1513. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 12:30 am
In reviewing the legal principles which apply in disposal cases, it stated: “[51]. [read post]
8 May 2012, 1:34 pm
Chick-fil-a’s Eat Mor Chikn v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 10:03 am
Coleman v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 1:11 am
People v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 5:25 am
Removing an item from someone’s body could conceivably qualify as a seizure, but it didn’t here and hasn’t in any of the surgical cases that have arisen since: The problem is that the item to be removed from the person’s body doesn’t belong to them; as I’ve noted in earlier posts, a “seizure” under the 4th Amendment interferes with someone’s possession and use of their property. [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 8:29 am
The AFP v. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 7:39 am
In Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 8:01 am
This protection is not based on abstract property rights arising under intellectual property law. [read post]
1 May 2018, 12:07 pm
Challenging Staleness and False Statements in Child Pornography Cases As the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals determined in United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 12:18 pm
· Apple v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 11:56 pm
[See More on Edison and the light bulb and ethical norms in intellectual property scholarship ] Within "Myth," Lemley also discusses the corset as an example of multiple independent invention, wherein he statesThe corset, itself the subject of one of the best-known Supreme Court patent cases, Egbert v. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 5:52 am
Morgan Properties Mgt. [read post]
1 May 2024, 12:08 pm
United States Surgical Corp., 135 F.3d 1456 (Fed. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 1:02 pm
I will add, however, that the authority of the Bankruptcy Court to hear a preference avoidance action, or indeed any action, is in a state of flux due to the Supreme Court’s holding in Stern v. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 9:52 am
Those specific items were among those listed as missing from the victim. [read post]
