Search for: "United States v. Cores"
Results 2161 - 2180
of 3,580
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2018, 6:14 pm
See State v. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 2:02 am
These have argued to not substantially be the base of the challenge as a small standard selection and arrangement gets a fairly thin copyright protection due to the “creative” standard of Originality being prevalent in the United States. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 9:09 am
Hadley, 431 F.3d 484, 507 (6th Cir. 2005), and United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 12:53 pm
Together, Whole Foods and Wild Oats operated 300 of the approximately 34,000 supermarkets in the United States. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 9:08 pm
Patent and Trademark Office updated its guidance related to the recent United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 2:40 pm
Nev. 2013) (granting a TRO to prevent trade secret misappropriation). [6] See, e.g., Core Labs v. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 8:29 pm
United States, 115 Wn.2d 52, 793 P.2d 969, 800 P.2d 1124 (1990). [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 8:29 pm
United States, 115 Wn.2d 52, 793 P.2d 969, 800 P.2d 1124 (1990). [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 11:59 am
In Reichle v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 3:49 pm
(Heller v District of Columbia ["Heller II"], 698 F Supp 2d 179 [D DC 2010]; Ezell v City of Chicago, — F Supp 2d —, 2010 WL 3998104 [ND Ill 2010]).4 Page 4 Penal Law §§ 265.01 and 400.005 Penal Law § 265.01(1) states, in relevant part, that a "person is guilty of criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree when: (1) [h]e possesses any firearm. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
The defendant were based in the United States. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 10:13 am
In Summum v. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
United States in 1967. [read post]
9 Sep 2024, 9:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 12:51 pm
See, The United States Department of Justice Manual §9-105.000. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 3:13 am
United States (S.D. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 10:01 am
Gottlieb, Bush v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:03 am
Court watchers equate the Perry case to that of Brown v Board of Education (abolishing the "separate but equal" fallacy in public schools) and Loving v Virginia (holding that a state could not prohibit interracial marriages).Whatever the outcome of the trial, an intermediate appeal to the Ninth Circuit is guaranteed to send this one to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 2:20 pm
Today’s Iowa Supreme Court ruling has no impact on the core federal claim in the lawsuit, the allegations that the districts have violated the Clean Water Act (and the companion Iowa statute) by discharging nitrates via a point source into “Waters of the United States” without a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 2:20 pm
Today’s Iowa Supreme Court ruling has no immediate impact on the core federal claim in the lawsuit, the allegations that the districts have violated the Clean Water Act (and the companion Iowa statute) by discharging nitrates via a point source into “Waters of the United States” without a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. [read post]
