Search for: "ALEXANDER v. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE"
Results 201 - 220
of 224
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2010, 9:24 am
Click Here DECISIONS Arkema, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 11:19 am
This view of the Constitution was enshrined by the Supreme Court in 1819, in the case McCollough v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:07 am
Dear Friends:Just wanted to tell you about this case that was recently decided against Aurora Loan Services. [read post]
25 May 2010, 8:09 am
In more obscure cases, like Alexander v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 6:33 am
The filings, in defense of Illinois, come from the Illinois Department of Natural Resources, the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago and the U.S. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 10:00 am
Alexander H. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 5:12 am
Plaintiff Alexander Karmansky was suspended after he was arrested for and charged with Criminal Contempt, 1 st Degree, a felony, and Criminal Trespass, 2nd Degree, a misdemeanor. [read post]
18 May 2009, 11:29 am
In Van Devent v. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 1:57 am
John v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 5:55 am
Written decisions from the New York Court of Appeals and four departments of the Appellate Division are always published officially. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
" Vice Chancellor Donald Parsons, Jr.: "Delaware decisions like Caremark and Stone v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 7:35 am
The Third Department stated: "We do not agree with the arbitrator's conclusion that petitioner's position, that its insured vehicle was not used 'principally...for hire,' is an affirmative defense. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 3:20 pm
Alexander, No. 07-1758 A sentence for possessing crack cocaine with the intent to distribute is affirmed where: 1) the district court did not commit a plain error in designating defendant a career offender for sentencing purposes as he committed a prior crime of violence, and he otherwise satisfied the criteria necessary to be considered a career offender; and 2) the sentence was otherwise reasonable. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 7:50 pm
Alexander, No. 071780 In a conviction for sale of controlled substance in or near school grounds, denial of writ of habeas corpus is affirmed over claims that the state courts unreasonably applied Batson v. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 7:31 pm
Alexander Chemical Corp., 2002 WL 34423377 (Ill. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Alexander, No. 07-3219 Denials of a motion to suppress evidence underlying defendant's plea of guilty to drug-related charges, as well as a motion to compel discovery of certain materials, are affirmed over claims that: 1) an officer had no basis for subjecting a package to extra scrutiny at an airport mail facility; 2) although concededly the package would inevitably have been discovered, defendant's alleged beating at the hands of an officer should preclude application of the… [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:01 am
That problem has not been fixed," said Ann Alexander, senior attorney with the Natural Resources Defense Council, who leads the legal challenge for local environmentalists. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, April 10, 2008 US v. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 8:46 am
Missouri Dep't of Corr., No. 07-1598 In an action raising a retaliation claim under Title VII against plaintiff's employer, a state correctional department, summary judgment for defendant is affirmed where, for purposes of a prima facie retaliation case: 1) a single comment at issue in the case was insufficient as a matter of law to support an objectively reasonable belief it amounted to unlawful sexual harassment; and 2) under the facts of the case, no reasonable person coul [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 8:11 am
Other partners include the district's Title V/CSHCN program. [read post]
