Search for: "Adam Winkler"
Results 201 - 220
of 262
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2007, 9:54 am
Adam Winkler, Free Speech Federalism, 9 University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law (2007). [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 9:30 pm
In an op-ed published in the New York Times, Adam Winkler, a professor at the U.C.L.A. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 12:00 am
Monday, Oct. 10 Adam Winkler, JD, a specialist in American constitutional law and professor of law at the UCLA School of Law, will deliver “Gunfight: The Battle Over the Right to Bear Arms in America” in the trial courtroom, 309 Anheuser-Busch Hall. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 4:42 am
Commentary on and analysis of the hearings comes from Richard Eskow at OurFuture, William Yeomans at ACSBlog, Adam Winkler, also at ACS Blog, Advice and Consent (podcast), David Fontana at Prawfsblawg, Christopher Ingraham in The Washington Post, Jay Michaelson in The Daily Beast, Robert Schlesinger at US News and World Report, Paul Callan at CNN, and Sen. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 8:47 am
Our brief, filed on behalf of CAC and six of the nation’s most prominent constitutional scholars—Bruce Ackerman, Jack Balkin, Burt Neuborne, James Ryan, Eric Schnapper, and Adam Winkler—demonstrates that the text and history of the Fourteenth Amendment permit the government to take race into account in certain circumstances in order to ensure equality of opportunity for all persons regardless of race. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 8:35 am
University of Texas on behalf of some of the nation’s leading constitutional law scholars, including Professors Bruce Ackerman, Jack Balkin, Burt Neuborne, James Ryan, Eric Schnapper, and Adam Winkler, as bad, revisionist history. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 3:50 am
” In an op-ed for The Washington Post, Mark Kaplan and Adam Winkler argue that “[p]artisan gerrymandering is one of the main reasons Congress has not enacted any significant new gun laws in recent years,” and that “if the Supreme Court rules [in Gill v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 8:23 am
The constitutional scholars amicus brief which advocated the same libertarian view of the Privileges or Immunities Clause was signed by such notables as Richard Aynes, Jack Balkin, Randy Barnett, Steven Calabresi, Michael Curtis, Michael Lawrence, William Van Alstyn and Adam Winkler. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 11:29 am
Our brief, filed on behalf of CAC and six of the nation’s most prominent constitutional scholars – Bruce Ackerman, Vikram Amar, Jack Balkin, Burt Neuborne, James Ryan, and Adam Winkler – demonstrates that the text and history of the Fourteenth Amendment permit government to take race into account in certain circumstances in order to ensure equality of opportunity for all persons regardless of race. [read post]
25 May 2018, 12:20 pm
“I think there’s a difference: When the law says you can’t do something, a lot of people say, ‘I’m not gonna do it,’” said Adam Winkler, a University of California at Los Angeles law professor who studies gun violence. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 7:38 am
At ACS blog, Adam Winkler predicts that in the four “potentially landmark” rulings yet to come this Term — including the same-sex marriage cases, Fisher, and Shelby County — “[t]he conservative justices will be bold and assertive, while the liberal justices will be hesitant and incremental. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 2:58 pm
Meanwhile, my friend and UCLA law colleague Adam Winkler thinks that Kagan's lack of judicial experience could be a major stumbling block, and that the nomination could end up hurting Obama: Her opponents are casting her as inexperienced because she has never been a judge and only practiced law for a few years, and that line of attack has purchase with the American people. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 9:25 am
In addition to Greenhouse and Lithwick, there are Adam Winkler (UCLA) and Sahil Kapur of “Talking Points. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 6:41 am
” Adam Winkler, UCLA: A good law exam answer . . . is rigorous and deep. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 2:47 am
Commentary on the cases and oral arguments come from Noah Feldman for Bloomberg View, Marci Hamilton at Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, David Gans at the Constitutional Accountability Center’s Text and History Blog, Eric Segall at ACSblog, John Culhane at Politico Magazine, Bob Tuttle and Ira Lupu at Cornerstone, Adam Winkler at ACSblog, Joseph Mansilla at Adventures in Doctrinal Wonderland, David Upham at The Public Discourse, Karl Laird at Oxford Human Rights Hub,… [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 5:09 am
” Commentary on Abramski comes from Noah Feldman of Bloomberg View, who contends that the decision “should stand as a reminder to the liberal justices that, when the chips are down, they really do believe that the law’s purpose and context matter”; from Adam Winkler, who argues in The New Republic that the decision shows that “Justice Kennedy is willing to support gun control,” which “may be the most important signal to come… [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 1:58 pm
For good measure, he could likewise authorize the entire White House staff, or indeed every single employee of the United States government, to also carry a concealed pistol in D.C.As the Moody article points out, President Perry could ask the D.C. police to deputize him, in order to take advantage of the D.C. law allowing the police to carry guns, but President Perry would have no practical need to ask the D.C. police to use their discretion to grant him the ability to do something he can do… [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 8:24 am
" He names as examples of the New Doctrinalists Richard Fallon, Kim Roosevelt, Adam WInkler, Dan Coenen, David Strauss, Mike Dorf, and others -- including me, for my piece on deference.Well! [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 2:04 pm
Thus Adam Winkler questions whether immunity should extend to situations where the user of deadly force acted in reasonable fear of lethal danger or forcible felony aimed at some third person other than himself (it would appear Zimmerman asserted danger-to-himself, not danger-to-third-parties, at the police station). [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 11:14 am
Lawrence, William Van Alstyne, Adam Winkler (none of whom are dreaded libertarians, so far as I know) and my reading of the Privileges or Immunities Clause is wrong? [read post]
