Search for: "Arizona Employers' Liability Cases"
Results 201 - 220
of 382
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2010, 3:20 pm
Once liability is proven against the employee, I believe that the employer/entity would be obligated to indemnify the employee. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 12:46 pm
In addition to the FTC’s actions, Operation Corrupt Collector includes two cases filed by the CFPB, three criminal cases brought by the U.S. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 4:12 pm
Liability & Enforcement Risks Heighten Need To Act To Review & Update Policies & Practices The restated rules in the 2013 Regulations make it imperative that Covered Entities review the revised rules carefully and updated their policies, practices, business associate agreements, training and documentation to comply with the updated requirements and other enforcement and liability risks. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 2:45 pm
Daniel Sorensen at BC law firm Waterstone Law posted on the firm’s BC Injury Lawyers Blog an article discussing responsibility under provincial occupiers’ liability legislation, including apportionment of liability. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 9:15 pm
(2) And what about the Arizona law firm advertising in Spanish as“specialists in immigration cases” when immigration is not among the 8 Certified Specialists identified by the State Bar of Arizona? [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 10:30 pm
Norfolk Southern Railway Issue: Whether an Ohio law that imposes filing requirements on asbestos-related claims is preempted for claims filed under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 11:56 am
Flores is currently the law for employers in California (and other states like Arizona, Oregon, Washington, and Nevada that are in the Ninth Circuit). [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 5:25 pm
An employee is a “supervisor” for purposes of vicarious liability under Title VII only if empowered by the employer to take tangible employment actions against the victim. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 3:03 am
The firm takes most cases of this type on a contingency fee basis and advances the case costs, and only gets paid for their fees and costs out of money recovered for clients. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 3:03 am
The firm takes most cases of this type on a contingency fee basis and advances the case costs, and only gets paid for their fees and costs out of money recovered for clients. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 7:43 pm
So far, I’ve only addressed Vanguard’s potential liability for back taxes. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 1:36 pm
Jan. 4, 2011), yet another metoclopramide/Reglan case, the plaintiffs conceded negligence, strict liability, and warranty. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:56 am
Ricci began having employment problems, which he believes was retaliation by Mr. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 4:35 am
District Court for the District of Arizona 2008), . . . in which the court ruled on the application of the [Computer Fraud and Abuse Act] to conduct similar to that at issue in this case. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 11:22 am
The case is McLaughlin v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 11:02 am
McBrideDocket: 10-235Issue(s): Whether the Federal Employers' Liability Act, 45 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 4:40 pm
EEOC, 06-341 This case should finally resolve longstanding circuit-court confusion over when a corporation may be held liable for employment discrimination based on the discriminatory conduct of a subordinate employee (sometimes known as "cat's paw" liability). [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 3:33 pm
BACKGROUND Complainant, a transgender woman, was a police detective in Phoenix, Arizona. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 2:33 pm
§ 1346(b)) waives sovereign immunity for personal-injury and negligence claims arising from the conduct of federal employees acting within the scope of their office or employment, giving district courts jurisdiction over claims against the United States and rendering the U.S. subject to suit and liability to the same extent a private person would be liable under state law. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 3:29 pm
Similarly, a Mississippi federal district court adopted the common-law agency theory of liability espoused by Judge Posner in the Seventh Circuit and found that a plaintiff had stated a claim under the CFAA. [read post]
