Search for: "Barton v. State"
Results 201 - 220
of 374
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2023, 1:50 am
As a matter of English law, if a state, as principal, represents that a person had authority to act on its behalf, it will be bound by the acts of that person with respect to anyone dealing with him as an agent on the faith of that representation (Attorney General of Ceylon v Silva (AD) [1953] A.C. 461). [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 4:22 am
This follows the Matal v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 3:58 am
Supreme Court case involving a statutory immigration provision has the potential for implications far beyond the narrow issue in the case”; she argues that “[t]he Supreme Court’s most recent statutory interpretation case, Barton v. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 9:38 pm
Ed Markey (D-Mass.) and Joe Barton (R-Texas) want information on Facebook courting kids http://t.co/JNXEnPLe 17:30:06, 2012-07-16 U.S. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 8:23 am
See Barton v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
General Motors Corp., 575 P.2d 1162, 1168-69 (Cal. 1978); see State Dept. of Health Services v. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 3:17 pm
Defendant: OXFORD BUILDING SERVICES, INC. and ALLIED BARTON SECUIRTY SERVICES, LLC. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 1:00 am
Barton v Wright Hassall LLP, heard 22 Nov 2017. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 6:12 am
Barton, 8 N.Y.3d 70 [2006]). [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 1:59 am
Brake and another v Chedington Court Estate Ltd, heard 1st November 2022 Barton and others v Morris and another in place of Gwyn–Jones, heard 3rd November 2022. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 10:02 am
Barton, 15-580, which involves a tricky issue of determining whether a state court ruled on a procedural or substantive basis and the types of review applicable to each. [read post]
22 Aug 2020, 9:25 am
Barton, 988 So. 2d 82 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008). [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
But unlike Houlihan Smith v. [read post]
15 Jan 2018, 1:00 am
Barton v Wright Hassall LLP, heard 22 Nov 2017. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 11:19 am
Barton “Buzz” Thompson served as special master for the United States Supreme Court in Montana v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 4:22 am
In an op-ed at The Appeal, Jay Willis calls Barton v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods to protect against their parallel importation into the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
The Software and Information Industry Association, arguing that “the Copyright Act contains the flexibility to deal with unforeseen applications of section 602″, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods… [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 1:22 pm
Sessions and Barton v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 1:00 am
Barton v Wright Hassall LLP, heard 22 Nov 2017. [read post]