Search for: "Beer v. United States"
Results 201 - 220
of 460
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2014, 1:42 pm
Holder, 13-471, involves a couple who fled the land of beer and bratwurst (no, not that one) after being fined and threatened with prison for home-schooling their children. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 2:03 pm
Since then, the company has grown into a leader in the arts-and-crafts retail industry, with 588 stores and around 13,000 employees across the United States. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 2:27 pm
Perry v Truefitt, 49 ER 749 stated that ‘A man is not to sell his own goods under pretence that they are the goods of another man. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 5:55 am
… As the United States correctly observes, the regulation “reflect[s] the agency’s balance of competing considerations in a specific setting that could easily be upset by the intrusion of a general private remedy such as that provided under Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:48 am
Co. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 1:24 pm
You can find guidance, under §1207.01 of the Trademark Manual of Examining Procedure (The rules that govern trademark practice at the United States Patent & Trademark Office). [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 5:01 am
Says the IPKat, this application rather reminds him of Rygrange's Application Case O/479/00, an application in bygone times to register the word UNITED as a trade mark for bottled beer and non-alcoholic drinks. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 1:09 pm
Cottrell v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 8:06 am
In United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 4:00 am
The homebrewing beer movement started in the United States in the 1970s (Charlie Papazian, The Complete Joy of Homebrewing). [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 8:00 am
With the explosion of craft beers in the United States, we can now do the same with our ales and lagers too. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:28 am
QE's approach of not teaming up with patent attorneys in these types of proceedings is as unusual as it is controversial in the German IP law community, but in the proceedings I watch there is no indication of them being less effective on their own.All three parties (Apple, Google, Microsoft) also dispatched in-house counsel from the United States, which speaks to the significance of this case.The U.S. equivalent of this patent is still at issue in a Motorola v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 4:52 am
It particularly refers to the practice of pursuing a case in England and Wales, in preference to other jurisdictions, such as the United States, which provide more extensive defences for those accused of making derogatory statements. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 8:48 am
In the recent case of United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 2:38 pm
United States, 483 U.S. 107 (1987). [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 9:58 am
Given the fundamental question it poses regarding an electorate’s right to amend its own state constitution, Schuette v. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 10:36 pm
With more than 26,000 Subway locations throughout the United States, and all the advertising done on the local and national level for the largest restaurant chain in the world, I shutter to think how many errant TM symbols are swinging in the wind, must be millions upon millions. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 9:01 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 5:00 am
State Farm Mut. [read post]
