Search for: "Bexis" Results 201 - 220 of 403
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2008, 9:03 am
Again, that sounds like a field preemption argument to us.And we know there are lots and lots more of these types of cases than just the few cited in the petition, because they're in Bexis' book. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 10:16 am
Bexis, stop it, this lesson's not about that.So you evaluate the situation. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 6:04 am
(By the way, Bexis wrote this post; Herrmann had nothing to do with it.) [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 12:08 pm by James Beck
  Bexis, is particularly pleased, since he filed an amicus curiae brief in Watts. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 12:08 pm by James Beck
  Bexis, is particularly pleased, since he filed an amicus curiae brief in Watts. [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 9:35 pm
Feb. 6, 2009) (here's the obligatory link to the opinion).Bexis's firm is still involved in these cases, so Bexis is still not participating in drafting posts about the cases. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm
Because Bexis is updating chapter two (information-based claims) of his book, he has some ideas for some shorter lists of interesting cases. [read post]
23 May 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  Before the A-Z litigation started, we’d thought, and Bexis had even written in his book, that limiting the duty to warn in this way was a loser. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 4:30 am by Steve McConnell
It is not as if this qualifies as a profound insight, but whenever we watch a drug or device trial (easier and easier to do now with various internet services) we walk away thinking that the two key prongs to any defense are context and the doctor's choice of treatment. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 2:34 pm
 (Bexis and Alexander are BOTH zip lining in exotic locales as we type this.) [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
  Such vaccine litigation (Bexis’ first exposure to a pharmaceutical mass tort) was ultimately adjudged so inimical to the public health that Congress prohibited it. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 11:36 am
The one False Claims case Bexis ever was involved in, United States ex rel. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 7:07 am
            While some of us are naturally jacked up—have you seen Bexis in short sleeves? [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 5:33 am
  Bexis’ book currently states, “[f]ield preemption has not been applied to FDA regulation of drugs and medical devices. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 11:38 am by Steve McConnell
  (Bexis is vacationing Down East and reports that the weather is miserable there and that it is no wonder the Maine contingent took their chances at Gettysburg.) [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 5:40 am
  Bexis recently gave us his survey of safe harbors against state consumer fraud claims, and we commented just the other day that perhaps a safe harbor should apply in a class action alleging California consumer fraud claims based on purported overrepresentation of an antidepressant’s efficacy. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 1:37 pm
Teric case to Bexis and will simply offer that most experts, lawyers, and judges use these phrases reflexively, without pondering their meaning. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 6:32 am by Steve McConnell
But there is also this: how do you solve a problem called Bexis? [read post]