Search for: "Burton v. Burton" Results 201 - 220 of 686
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2010, 8:23 am
As to whether the underwriters should have discovered the fraud, Burton J said this would go to whether it was just and equitable to make an order under s.51. [read post]
20 May 2015, 3:02 am by INFORRM
Lucy Moorman, partner and barrister at Simons Muirhead & Burton Canongate was represented by Martin Soames, Gordon Clough and Jeffrey Smele of Simons Muirhead & Burton. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 2:12 am
Justice Burton explained that the law favoured the litigation of issues only once, in the most appropriate forum, and therefore the party which had commenced proceedings in the “non-contractual jurisdiction” must desist, on the basis of commercial good sense. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 5:02 am by INFORRM
The claimant was represented by Simons Muirhead & Burton and the defendant by RPC LLP. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 12:34 am
In Starlight Shipping Co v Allianz Marine and Aviation Versicherungs AG & Ors [2011] EWHC 3381 the High Court ruled that the terms of a settlement embodied in a Tomlin Order  could be enforced by summary relief and that it was not necessary to issue fresh proceedings to do so.Starlight Shipping Co (Starlight) issued proceedings against its insurers (including company and Lloyd's market insurers) in 2006 in relation to a claim arising out of the loss of a vessel it owned, the… [read post]