Search for: "CAMPAIGN FOR ACCOUNTABILITY v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE" Results 201 - 220 of 460
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2019, 2:20 pm by Mark Graber
But the President had decided to fire Comey before hearing from the Department of Justice. [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
The defendants have counterclaimed for copyright infringement, damages, and an account of profits. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 7:00 am by Seamus Hughes, Devorah Margolin
Prior to the ruling, federal courts were able to prosecute individuals as young as 15 for material support, but in the wake of the Sessions v. [read post]
12 Jan 2019, 4:05 pm by David Kris
Trump had refused to criticize Russia on the campaign trail, praising President Vladimir V. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 11:48 am by Susan Schneider
Nor is the Secretary's role limited to final approval or rejection: Officials of the Department also attend and participate in the open meetings at which proposals are developed.Johanns v. [read post]
25 Mar 2017, 4:55 am by Jordan Brunner
Turning to terrorism, Bobby Chesney flagged the Justice Department’s suit to revoke the citizenship of convicted al Qaeda operative Iyman Faris, a naturalized U.S. citizen, and Nora Ellingsen chronicled the ISIS-free week we had when it came to international terrorism prosecutions. [read post]
23 Nov 2017, 9:30 pm by Sarah Madigan
Sessions disapproved of the Justice Department’s previous use of these kinds of documents. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 5:16 am by James Petrila
While collection of satellite communications fell outside of FISA’s definition of “electronic surveillance” so long as the target of the collection was outside the U.S., internal Department of Defense regulations governed the way in which the NSA could retain and disseminate U.S. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 8:45 am by Amy Howe
  Only the federal government, the Justice Department argued, can make immigration policy. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 5:01 am by Scott R. Anderson
For example, in a 2000 opinion by the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) justifying military intervention in Kosovo, the executive branch asserted that “where the President has requested an appropriation in order to continue military operations, evidence showing that Members of Congress were specifically aware of the purposes of the appropriation request will tend to show that Congress intended to authorize continuing military operations[.] [read post]
10 Dec 2011, 6:20 am by Jeralyn
The Justice Department and the State Department acknowledged the laundering this week. [read post]
24 May 2022, 5:01 am by George Croner
A third annual report from the Department of Justice, as required by § 107 of FISA, was transmitted to Congress on April 29. [read post]