Search for: "COATS v. STATE"
Results 201 - 220
of 853
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2009, 1:46 am
[IPKat comment: 2 huge problems with this - (1) all these factors go towards showing that there's a link between the marks, but they don't really show that the link has 'rubbed off' on the later mark to give its owner an unfair advantage; (2) these are the factors that were used in relation to detriment to distinctive character, but the court has just said that these are two different types of harm; (3) the ECJ in Intel v CPM said such factors are insufficient for… [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 2:30 am
Coatings v. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 2:26 am
USA: Fox Television Stations, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 5:48 am
In Yumul v. [read post]
29 Jul 2007, 9:41 am
State v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm
Last month, the Supreme Court heard argument in Torres v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 12:02 pm
In People v. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 9:59 am
USA, Inc. v. [read post]
22 May 2018, 6:21 am
Grayson Clary summarized the Fourth Circuit decision in United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 8:18 am
Yet, today, there are only four biosimilars on the market in the United States. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
Md. 2004); Coates v. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 2:51 pm
Boston Scientific v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 9:40 pm
They had raised the 80-pound brindle-coated dog since he was a puppy, he says. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 8:59 am
Coats stated that he wanted a policy providing benefits for psychiatric care that would be equal to or better than the $20,000 coverage provided by his current policy. [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 1:23 pm
In the recent case of Jorge v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 6:30 am
State”Here are two endorsements:“Alabama legal history can be surprising. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 11:28 am
The crime scene described at the beginning of United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 11:18 am
In the case of Anderson v. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 11:18 am
In the case of Anderson v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:17 am
Both place their faith in the state, and in the community, to be sure. [read post]
