Search for: "Doe v. Regents of the University of California" Results 201 - 220 of 312
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Rosenbaum, Amanda Mangaser Savage, Kathryn Eidmann and Sarah Camiscoli of the bar of the State of the State of LA, California, of counsel), for appellants.Letitia James, Attorney General, New York (Mark S. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Rosenbaum, Amanda Mangaser Savage, Kathryn Eidmann and Sarah Camiscoli of the bar of the State of the State of LA, California, of counsel), for appellants.Letitia James, Attorney General, New York (Mark S. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 10:57 am by Brett Holubeck
Regents of the University of California), and whether Title VII prohibits discrimination based on gender identity and sex stereotyping (R.G. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 3:25 am by SHG
” Purdue Univ., 928 F.3d at 669 (quoting Doe v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 11:52 am by Lyle Denniston
University of California Regents (10-1029). [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 8:44 am by Arielle Harris
The Regents of the University of California, et al. (2020) 51 Cal.App.5th 226. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 4:54 pm by Christa Culver
§ 1623; (2) whether a court must undertake conflict preemption analysis after concluding that an express preemption provision does not apply in a case involving both types of preemption claims.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (California Supreme Court)Petition for certiorariBrief of the Regents of the University of California et al. in oppositionBrief of the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges et al. in… [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:55 am by Julie Brook, Esq.
© The Regents of the University of California, 2012. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 6:32 am by Michael C. Dorf
Wade--was a Burger Court decision, as was its compromise ruling on affirmative action, Regents of the Univ. of California v. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 8:53 pm
The Fifth Circuit decision in Regents of the University of California, et al., v. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 3:47 pm by Jonathan Zasloff
Regents of the University of California, the famous 1993 California Supreme Court ruling that a person has no property right in his excised spleen. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 7:58 pm by Arthur F. Coon
The Regents of the University of California (2020) 51 Cal.App.5th 226, and my 7/2/20 post on it can be found here. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 11:17 am by Catherine Fisk
State Bar of California), and compulsory student-activity fees because public universities use them to fund all student activities (Board of Regents v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 4:59 pm by Erin Miller
United Airlines (7th Cir. 1971); Regents of University of California v. [read post]