Search for: "Does 1 through 10, inclusive" Results 201 - 220 of 1,603
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2018, 6:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Subsequent legislation established a further schedule of corporate income tax reductions through fiscal year 2022. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 1:08 pm by Greg Guedel
The response due date depends on the fiscal year end of the prime applicant, with range of 2/15/10 – 8/1/10. [read post]
As antibodies are specialized proteins, they are deemed to be biological materials and, as such, are subject to the provisions of article 10 (IX)[1] of the Brazilian Patent Statute. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 5:25 am
The Appellate Division annulled the Board’s determination with respect to Teacher’s seniority for the purposes of layoff and it was directed to award seniority credit to her for her service between November 6, 2006 through and including February 10, 2010, and directed the District to reinstate her to her position as a full-time probationary teacher in the foreign language tenure area with back pay and benefits. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 7:25 am by Kevin Russell
EPA, specifically:  to what extent does the Constitution limit Congress’s authority to address environmental problems through legislation that limits the rights of private property owners? [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 8:51 am
 How does the copyright system ensure that the value of copyright works are recognized? [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 4:14 am by INFORRM
It’s the norm to pay for legal information, through legal databases (eg. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:15 am by Jeroen Willekens
G 3/08, OJ EPO 2011, 10, reasons 12.2.2, T 1145/10 of 26 February 2016, reasons 5). [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 7:32 am by Jon L. Gelman
The bill directs the Attorney General to finalize rulemaking to remove marijuana and THC from the schedules of controlled substances and deem the drug or substance that does not meet the requirements for inclusion in any schedule. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 2:07 am by Roel van Woudenberg
Although the requirement for different decisions by two boards in the case of a referral by the President of the EPO (Article 112(1) (b) EPC) does not apply to referrals byboards, the boards should in any case seek to minimise inconsistencies in the case law.56. [read post]