Search for: "Doyle v. State" Results 201 - 220 of 484
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2010, 6:41 am by Andrew Breidenbach
Michael Doyle of McClatchy Newspapers tells the “long-shot” story of United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 6:15 am by Rachel Sachs
Other coverage continued to focus on some of the other amicus briefs filed in Hollingsworth and United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2009, 7:38 am
Van Hollen for his decision last month not to defend the state's new domestic registry in Appling v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 8:40 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Yesterday the US Supreme Court, on a narrow 5-4 majority, ordered the state of California to reduce prison crowding because of inadequate medical care in a case style Brown v. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 4:21 pm by INFORRM
Two recent decisions, Economou v de Freitas and Doyle v Smith, provide some guidance on this question, but seem to pull in slightly different directions. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
While the Supreme Court has not retreated from the core holding in Ferber, it has made shutting down the marketplace more difficult with its child pornography holdings in a series of cases, including United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 8:57 am
"An agreement that violates the term limits rule is against public policy (see Matter of City of Utica Urban Renewal Agency v Doyle, 66 AD3d 1495; Karedes v Village of Endicott, 297 AD2d 413, 415). [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 5:57 am by Marissa Miller
The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette’s Len Boselovic covers Sandifer v. [read post]
24 May 2013, 7:19 am by Allison Trzop
Fraser discusses Northwest, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 7:26 am by Conor McEvily
” Finally, Joan Biskupic of the USA Today previews next week’s argument in United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
The petitioner’s allegations, if true, would not establish that “the management of the entity is unable or unwilling to reasonably permit or promote the stated purpose of the entity to be realized or achieved, or [that] continuing the entity is financially unfeasible” (Matter of 1545 Ocean Ave., LLC, 72 AD3d 121, 131; see Barone v Sowers, 128 AD3d 484; Doyle v Icon, LLC, 103 AD3d 440). [read post]