Search for: "Foster v. State"
Results 201 - 220
of 3,972
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2011, 7:20 am
In McKimmy v Melling, the Court of Appeals held that when ruling on a change of domicile motion, a trial court should consider whether a proposed parenting time schedule provides “a realistic opportunity to preserve and foster the parental relationship” and not whether the proposed schedule would be the best plan. [read post]
1 Aug 2009, 10:07 am
Foster v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 6:43 pm
In State v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:05 am
Extradition in the public interest would, however, generally be proportionate under Article 8(2) (Norris v Government of the United States of America (No.2) [2010] 2 AC 487). [read post]
30 Mar 2021, 7:21 pm
Written by Marcus Teo (Sheridan Fellow (Incoming), National University of Singapore) Since Foster v Driscoll [1929] 1 KB 470, common law courts have recognised that contracts made with the intention to commit a criminal offence in a foreign state are unenforceable, even if the contract contemplated an alternative mode or place of performance. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 11:38 am
State v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 4:25 pm
Baby Girl before both the United States Supreme Court and the South Carolina Supreme Court and in Nielson v. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 4:00 pm
To download a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: People v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 4:21 pm
Axel previously prosecuted white-collar crime cases in the Central District of California and handled United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 3:51 am
Foster, Fay E. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 8:43 am
United States [Cornell LII Backgrounder] that a federal sentencing law does not permit sentencing judges to impose or lengthen prison terms for the purpose of fostering the defendant's rehabilitation. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 11:32 am
In Foster v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 6:33 pm
Cleve Foster and Gayland Bradford. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 4:05 am
A settlement agreement has been reached in the long-running litigation in Pedreira v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 5:53 pm
Domalakes in the case of Foster v. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 12:00 pm
State of California (IGRA)Genskow v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 8:07 am
On February 22, 2012, the United States Supreme Court issued an opinion in Messerschmidt v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 6:00 am
” The Court reasoned that a bright-line rule requiring physical presence in the state was necessary because it “encourage[d] settled expectations and . . . foster[ed] investment by businesses and individuals. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 7:32 pm
Kansas); jury selection (Foster v. [read post]
7 Sep 2013, 7:55 am
I mention the cost issue here because ‘2 v. 3’ often devolves into ‘2 x $45,000 v. 3 x $45,000. [read post]
