Search for: "Gottlieb v Gottlieb" Results 201 - 220 of 417
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2016, 3:22 am by Broc Romanek
Here’s the intro from this Cleary Gottlieb blog: In a recent ruling (Halo Elecs., Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:19 am
Karp, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, on Saturday, May 28, 2016 Tags: Accountability, Arbitration, Banks, CFPB, Class actions, Consumer protection, Contracts, Dodd-Frank Act, Financial institutions, Financial regulation Fed, FDIC, and “Not Credible” Resolution Plans Posted by Michael Krimminger and Sean O’Neal, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, on Sunday, May 29, 2016 Tags: Bankruptcy, Bankruptcy Code, Banks, FDIC, Federal Reserve, Financial… [read post]
20 May 2016, 6:45 am
McLaughlin and Yafit Cohn, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, on Friday, May 13, 2016 Tags: Acquisition agreements, Contracts, Corporate fraud, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Due diligence, Fair values,Fairness review, Liability standards, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Reliance Genuine Parts Co. v. [read post]
11 May 2016, 6:10 am
Thus, while the Order clarifies a roadmap (set forth recently in Corwin v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 2:50 am by Amy Howe
Commentary on Zubik v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 3:05 am by Broc Romanek
The staff observed that, although there are some prescriptive and structured elements, the current requirements are largely principles-based, with disclosure determined on the basis of “materiality” as defined in TSC Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 3:05 am by Broc Romanek
The staff observed that, although there are some prescriptive and structured elements, the current requirements are largely principles-based, with disclosure determined on the basis of “materiality” as defined in TSC Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 6:48 pm
And finally, Part V proposes ways to modify and improve the current IPRs to protect ICH more efficiently. [read post]
Thursday The Court is not sitting today, but judgment is being handed down in the joined criminal cases R v Jogee and R v Ruddock. [read post]
Tuesday Today and tomorrow the Supreme Court is hearing the appeal in Patel v Mirza, a case concerning when illegal conduct prevents a claimant recovering money he has paid under a contract. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 6:13 am
Sullivan, Ropes & Gray LLP, on Sunday, January 17, 2016 Tags: Compliance and disclosure interpretation, Derivatives, Investment Company Act, Investor protection, Leverage,Mutual funds, No-action letters, Private funds, Risk, Risk management, Rule 18f-4, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Securities Regulation, Swaps PECO v. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 3:09 am by Peter Mahler
Add to the growing list of equity-driven rulings for these contract-centric creatures of statute an unpublished decision last week by a New Jersey intermediate appellate court in All Saints University of Medicine Aruba v Chilana, No. [read post]