Search for: "Graham v. Smith"
Results 201 - 220
of 377
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2013, 5:12 am
Here's a note on a topic that has not been greatly appreciated in IP circles: the recent decision of the UK Supreme Court in R (on the application of Prudential plc and another) v Special Commissioner of Income Tax and another [2013] UKSC 1. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 8:27 am
Site-specific cat.Sculpture by Wang Du, exhibited by the Museum of Cat in 2017Moreover, as described in the chapter by Donn Zaretsky,** we encounter the dispute between installation artist Christoph Büchel and the Massachusetts Museum of Contemporary Art as evidence of VARA’s [relative] success at granting relief to artists when “a museum behaves badly” (citing New York Times art critic Robert Smith’s, p. 50, ‘Training Ground for Moral Rights: MASS… [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm
We had posts about this decision from Gabrielle Guillemin and Graham Smith. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 4:09 pm
For a post covering some of the above and also other Internet Legal developments to look out for in 2016, on Graham Smith’s Cyberleagle blog [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
With the case of Graham v. [read post]
26 May 2017, 6:29 am
(relisted after the April 13, April 21, April 28, May 11 and May 18 conferences) Graham v. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 12:44 pm
Michael Pauling, Senior Assistant Attorney General; Graham H. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 1:55 am
Michael Pauling, Senior Assistant Attorney General; Graham M. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 8:31 am
Michael Pauling, Senior Assistant Attorney General; Graham M. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 11:03 am
Michael Pauling, Senior Assistant Attorney General; and Graham M. [read post]
17 May 2016, 2:27 am
”In my opinion, the textual expression of the recipe can be protected (and the accompanying images), but this is a very limited protection.Edited to add: The always astute Graham Smith has usefully pointed out that a collection of recipes could have copyright as a compilation. [read post]
31 May 2017, 7:32 am
Graham v. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 10:10 am
In Smith v. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 6:13 pm
The Board made no findings, moreover, regarding theobviousness factors laid out in Graham v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 4:05 pm
We had a post by Graham Smith as to the implications of this decision for the present regime. [read post]
6 May 2013, 5:38 am
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: AAA v Associated Newspapers heard 29 and 30 April 2013 (Master of the Rolls, Tomlinson and Ryder LJJ) Euromoney plc v Aviation News Ltd heard 2 May 2013 (Tugendhat J) ABK v KDT & anr, heard 3 May 2013 (Tugendhat J) Also on Inforrm last week Freedom of expression loses in Swaziland case – Dario Milo Defamation and Satire – Steven Price Paris Brown: A Case in Point for… [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 8:12 am
State v. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 5:53 am
Graham, 379 N.C. 75, 84 (2021). [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 4:12 pm
The Sydney Morning Herald has a piece about the strict guidelines that will be in place for the Ben Roberts-Smith defamation case against two newspapers. [read post]
19 May 2021, 2:01 pm
Graham v. [read post]
