Search for: "Holder v. Martin"
Results 201 - 220
of 253
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2012, 5:27 pm
[Week commencing 13 August] Full Fact v Evening Standard, Clause 1, 17/08/2012; Joseph Horner v The Observer, Clause 1, 16/08/2012; Mr Christopher Mackin v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Jane Hughes v The Independent on Sunday, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Dr Yannis Alexandrides v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Mr Oliver Gray v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Alex Jarvis v Daily Mail, Clauses 3, 5, 15/08/2012; Inspired Thinking Group… [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 11:51 am
Holder (2010). [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 12:25 pm
Distribution v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 5:49 am
Martin Husovec noted in his introduction, “Prof. [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 5:15 pm
Supreme Court’s holding in Morrison v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:58 am
But in June, the Supreme Court in Holder v. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 7:17 am
Lord Neuberger echoed this statement regarding the right-holder's choices and the consequences flowing from choices made in the design field:52. [read post]
20 Apr 2013, 7:00 am
The Supreme Court released its decision on the centuries-old Alien Tort Statute (ATS) in Kiobel v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 8:45 am
” The film attributes the RBG phenomenon to the justice’s blistering dissents in 2013 and 2014, in cases like Shelby County v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 4:37 am
See McZeal v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 9:47 am
Since the Klass and others v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
When made in a federal proceeding or to a federal office or agency, the disclosure does not operate as a waiver in a federal or state proceeding if:(1) the disclosure is inadvertent; (2) the holder of the privilege or protection took reasonable steps to prevent disclosure; and (3) the holder promptly took reasonable steps to rectify the error, including (if applicable) following Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5)(B). [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm
In Roach v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 6:08 am
Wollschlaeger v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(IPKat) EU favours disclosure of computer patents before standards are set (Intellectual Property Watch) Trade Marks Court of First Instance finds RAUTARUUKKI fails to satisfy acquired distinctiveness criterion: Rautaruukki Oyj v OHIM (Class 46) Court of First Instance finds original signature of famous Italian lutist Antonio Stradivari, in arte Stradivarius, of the 17th century, cannot be read by relevant consumers: T‑340/06 (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 2:31 am
With respect to the binding force of a jurisdiction agreement in a bill of lading for the third party holder of the bill of lading, stakeholders have suggested that a carrier under a bill of lading should be bound by and at the same token allowed to invoke a jurisdiction clause against the regular third-party holder, unless the bill is not sufficiently clear in determining jurisdiction. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 7:27 am
’ (quoting Pure Power Boot Camp v. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 3:33 pm
Eric Holder That Discriminating Against a Transgender Woman Violated Title VII Women's Rights - So Yesterday... [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 4:15 pm
As IPKat explains, Kelis is not the rights holder of the song: her problem is with her producers, not Beyoncé. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 2:02 pm
Copyright's Arc, Martin Skladany: © should vary across the globe. [read post]
