Search for: "In Re Federal Coal Company" Results 201 - 220 of 416
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2014, 3:40 am by Amy Howe
Jacobs reports that, “[i]f coal companies get their way when the Supreme Court reviews U.S. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 11:40 pm by JD Hull
Massey Coal Company (June 8, 2009), the Court ruled last year that a West Virginia judge should indeed have disqualified himself from hearing an appeal of a $50 million jury verdict against an a coal company because its CEO had been a major campaign donor. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 10:00 pm by JD Hull
Massey Coal Company (June 8, 2009), the Court ruled last year that a West Virginia judge should indeed have disqualified himself from hearing an appeal of a $50 million jury verdict against an a coal company because its CEO had been a major campaign donor. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 10:59 pm by JD Hull
Massey Coal Company (June 8, 2009), the Court ruled last year that a West Virginia judge should indeed have disqualified himself from hearing an appeal of a $50 million jury verdict against an a coal company because its CEO had been a major campaign donor. [read post]
14 May 2010, 10:47 pm by JD Hull
Massey Coal Company (June 8, 2009), the Court ruled last year that a West Virginia judge should indeed have disqualified himself from hearing an appeal of a $50 million jury verdict against an a coal company because its CEO had been a major campaign donor. [read post]
28 May 2013, 8:01 am by LindaMBeale
  That means re-investing in basic science research through NSF and other peer-reviewed governmental funding of basic science. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm by admin
Click Here Southwest Missouri Pet Supply Dealer to Pay $56,632 Penalty for Re-Labeling, Selling Misbranded Cattle and Hog Insecticide. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 8:33 pm by Steven M. Taber
– Enviro.BLR.com, July 6, 2010 A pipeline company based in Tulsa recently agreed to pay a $418,000 fine in order to resolve violations of the federal Clean Water Act. [read post]
GDP.[5]  Opponents of the PJM MOPR argue that there are a number of federal benefits for oil and gas producers, including, but not limited to (i) the intangible drilling costs deduction, which allows companies to deduct from taxable income costs incurred from domestic drilling of wells,[6] and (ii) last-in, first-out accounting, which allows fossil fuel companies to reflect lower inventory for purposes of calculating taxable income.[7]  Some coal-fired… [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Some of the nation’s biggest spenders on federal lobbying, including the U.S. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Federal Trade Commission (FTC) that Uber misrepresented how much its drivers earn when recruiting new drivers, Uber agreed to pay $20 million in a settlement, which also prohibits the company from misrepresenting drivers’ earnings in the future. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 9:02 am
"We're not patent trolls," Michaels said. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 6:25 am by Don Asher
  The Deadliest Employers Here in Indiana and Illinois, employers come in all shapes and sizes; however, for the five focus industries in the ISN research study, most will be companies or corporations with sufficient size to require state and federal regulatory compliance. [read post]