Search for: "In Re Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure"
Results 201 - 220
of 516
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Oct 2014, 5:47 pm
First problem is, one of my basic principles for judicial elections is to prefer people with at least 15 years legal experience–and to demand at least 10 years–before voting for someone as a trial judge, a job that requires a lot of immediate evidentiary and procedural rulings from the bench and for which the State of Florida provides little support in the way of law clerks and the like. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 2:37 pm
A federal habeas case provides a "window" onto the entire procedural history of a criminal case--trial, direct appeal, state postconviction, and, finally, federal habeas. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 7:01 am
Brown, 17-887 Issue: Whether the Indiana procedure that allows trial-counsel Strickland v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 3:35 pm
S A FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL, LLC, a foreign limited liability company, d/b/a OEC LATIN AMERICA, Appellee. 3rd District.Civil procedure -- Dismissal -- Failure to prosecute -- Error to grant motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution where movant did not provide required sixty-day notice required by revised rule and neither movant nor trial court recognized three instances of record activity preceding dismissal -- Any filing of record during applicable time frame is sufficient… [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Bonin, No. 07-30827 In a case involving an individual previously arrested for making threats to country music singer George Strait and later for threats to a magistrate judge, an order committing defendant to the custody of the Attorney General pursuant to a dangerousness determination is vacated and remanded where the determination contravened the requisite statutory procedure. . [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:17 pm
Such a procedure is not allowed because the Florida Administrative Rules require the breath test operator or agency inspector to be an “employee” of the law enforcement agency. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 10:29 am
Recent amendments to federal rules of appellate, bankruptcy, civil and criminal procedure require redaction of personal identification information from documents filed with the court - The blogging lawyers & attorneys at K & L Gates in the firm's Electronic Discovery Law Blog William F. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 12:00 am
It is virtually self-evident to me now that no combination of procedural rules or substantive regulations ever can save the death penalty from its inherent constitutional deficiencies. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 9:47 pm
Florida, 05-8820 While Lawrence v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 2:45 pm
What’s interesting and reassuring is that we’re having a fairly normal criminal trial. [read post]
27 May 2016, 8:00 am
If you’re looking for another outlet for your misanthropy, you’ve come to the right place. [read post]
9 May 2022, 4:27 am
The Court serially ruled that the petitioner stated sufficient grounds to dissolve Matrix Model Staffing, Inc. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 4:17 pm
WAMSER, and FLORIDA AFFORDABLE HOUSING, INC., Appellants, v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 10:26 am
See, e.g., In re Commitment of Morel, 35 Fla. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 6:05 am
In In re Hood, No. 12-15925, 2013 US App. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 5:02 pm
We lawyers need to develop a better (more accurate, both in explaining and predicting) theory of what science is to better accommodate our procedural rules to scientific inquiry. [read post]
30 May 2012, 11:06 am
You can find below the information from the LSA program re: our little gathering on crim law and crim procedure. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 10:14 am
Issue a criminal notice to appear, maybe. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 12:34 am
As I mentioned recently, I spent the last three months re-writing the Fourth Amendment materials for the Kamisar LaFave and Israel Criminal Procedure casebook for the 16th edition that will be available for use this coming fall semester. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
Castro, 540 U.S. 375 (2003); and 2) although no notice of the recharacterization would have been required under the rules set out in US v. [read post]