Search for: "In re L.J.-1 and L.J.-2" Results 201 - 220 of 264
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2016, 5:19 am
  Of course, we lambastedthe Karl decision ourselves (and made Karl #1 in our inaugural worst decisions of the year post). [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 2:39 pm by Glenn
The recently closed Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) investigation of Google, Inc. for alleged monopolization[1] illustrates a truism of antitrust practice. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am by Barry Sookman
For example, the US Congress,[2] the European Union[3] and its member states including the UK[4] and Ireland,[5] Australia[6] and others have been re-examining their copyright laws in light of the challenges posed by digital technologies. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 7:10 am by Florian Mueller
Baumol, 'Reasonable and Nondiscriminatory (RAND) Royalties, Standards Selection, and Control of Market Power,' 73 Antitrust L.J. 1, 7–11 (2005). [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 5:34 pm by David Kopel
Supreme Court precedents state that common arms cannot be banned. 2. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 12:26 pm by Josh Blackman
Rev. 1703 (2020); Jonathan Remy Nash, National Personal Jurisdiction, 68 Emory L.J. 509 (2019); Wendy Perdue, Aliens, the Internet, and "Purposeful Availment": A Reassessment of Fifth Amendment Limits on Personal Jurisdiction, 98 Nw. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 5:50 am by Harold Hongju Koh
” Let me address Ukraine’s four wars, its grand strategy, and what international lawyers have done and must do. 1. [read post]