Search for: "In the Matter of Amendments to Rules 1 and 10"
Results 201 - 220
of 5,428
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2016, 4:56 am
Evid. 305(e)(1) incorporates the Edwards rule. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 2:14 pm
The new rule will make it more onerous for promoters (or other investors for that matter) to take warrants in listed companies as they will have to risk a significant amount of the investment (25%), thereby making warrants a less attractive instrument.Other decisions by SEBI are the following:1. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 7:27 am
So it is impossible for the "rule" to affect any FDA action - no matter what it could be - taken before that date, since before that the FDAAA, and the "rule," didn't exist. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 7:01 am
On October 10, 2007, the USPTO published a "Clarification of the Transitional Provisions Relating to Continuing Applications and Applications Containing Patentably Indistinct Claims (signed 10 October 2007). [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:23 am
Rule 59(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedurepermits a motion to alter or amend judgment to be filedwithin ten (10) days of entry of judgment. [read post]
8 Jan 2025, 11:54 am
Today, more and more evidence that the government wants to use in a criminal matter is digital stuff stored in the cloud, or on a smartphone, tablet, drive, or computer. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am
Refusals to Deal Generally 1. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 5:08 am
Those entities identified as "Large Traders" must comply with the self-identification requirements of Rule 13h-1(b) by December 1, 2011. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 3:17 am
The Opposition Division decided that:- the subject-matter of claim 1 of the main request (patent as granted) was not new (Articles 100(a), 52(1) and 54 EPC);- the claimed subject-matter of auxiliary requests I and II failed to meet the requirements of Article 123(2) EPC;- auxiliary request III was not admitted into the proceedings pursuant to Rule 116 EPC; and- account being taken of the amendments made by the proprietor during the opposition… [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 11:00 am
The purpose of subsection (i)(10) is to "avoid the possibility of shareholders having to consider matters which have already been favorably acted upon by management. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 11:00 am
The purpose of subsection (i)(10) is to "avoid the possibility of shareholders having to consider matters which have already been favorably acted upon by management. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
That itself is a tall order, because lawyers typically do not ask for a brand new rule of law. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 2:32 am
As a matter of principle this is now the only real test”. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 5:01 pm
As a rule, the Boards admit amendments when they are filed in response to objections or evidence that are not part of the impugned decision but have been submitted for the first time in the course of the appeal proceedings. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 6:51 am
Oct. 1, 2018) (J. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 3:52 am
Moreover, the adopting release does not indicate (1) whether the amendments should be applied only to periodic reports covering periods ending on or after the effective date, or (2) whether the amendments should be applied to all periodic reports filed after the effective date. [read post]
6 May 2024, 10:41 am
An “act of public participation” includes, “whistleblowing activities concerned with matters of societal importance, administrative or judicial claims, protests, and demonstrations” (clause 1(1)) and an “abusive lawsuit” appears to include any court proceedings brought in relation to an act of public participation. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 1:00 am
The examining division held the subject-matter of claims 1 and 2 of the set of claims filed with letter dated 7 August 2015 "to be within the exception to patentability Article 53(b) EPC and Rule 28(2) EPC" and refused the application.III. [read post]
11 Oct 2006, 4:38 pm
Do these voting rules and procedures only apply to the election of board members or to voting on other matters as well? [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 7:23 pm
In 2000, Congress amended the Federal Rules of Evidence to clarify, among other things, that Rule 702 had grown past the Supreme Court’s tentative, preliminary statement in Daubert, to include over a decade and half of further judicial experience and scholarly comment. [read post]
