Search for: "In the Matter of Amendments to Rules 1 and 10"
Results 201 - 220
of 5,483
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2021, 7:32 am
The court rescheduled this case 10 times before finally relisting it after the April 1 conference, so at least one of the justices has been paying very close attention to the matter. [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 9:45 pm
The procedural rules governing civil cases in federal court rest on the principle of trans-substantivity, which holds that uniform rules should govern all types of cases, no matter their subject. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 4:56 am
Evid. 305(e)(1) incorporates the Edwards rule. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 2:06 am
Earlier posts, here and here, have considered various aspects of “sufficient interest” in faculty proceedings under S10(1) and S10(2) Faculty Jurisdiction Rules 2015 (as amended) [1]. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 7:27 am
So it is impossible for the "rule" to affect any FDA action - no matter what it could be - taken before that date, since before that the FDAAA, and the "rule," didn't exist. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 2:14 pm
The new rule will make it more onerous for promoters (or other investors for that matter) to take warrants in listed companies as they will have to risk a significant amount of the investment (25%), thereby making warrants a less attractive instrument.Other decisions by SEBI are the following:1. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:23 am
Rule 59(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedurepermits a motion to alter or amend judgment to be filedwithin ten (10) days of entry of judgment. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 7:01 am
On October 10, 2007, the USPTO published a "Clarification of the Transitional Provisions Relating to Continuing Applications and Applications Containing Patentably Indistinct Claims (signed 10 October 2007). [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 11:00 am
The purpose of subsection (i)(10) is to "avoid the possibility of shareholders having to consider matters which have already been favorably acted upon by management. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 11:00 am
The purpose of subsection (i)(10) is to "avoid the possibility of shareholders having to consider matters which have already been favorably acted upon by management. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 3:17 am
The Opposition Division decided that:- the subject-matter of claim 1 of the main request (patent as granted) was not new (Articles 100(a), 52(1) and 54 EPC);- the claimed subject-matter of auxiliary requests I and II failed to meet the requirements of Article 123(2) EPC;- auxiliary request III was not admitted into the proceedings pursuant to Rule 116 EPC; and- account being taken of the amendments made by the proprietor during the opposition… [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 5:08 am
Those entities identified as "Large Traders" must comply with the self-identification requirements of Rule 13h-1(b) by December 1, 2011. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am
Refusals to Deal Generally 1. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
That itself is a tall order, because lawyers typically do not ask for a brand new rule of law. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 6:51 am
Oct. 1, 2018) (J. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 2:32 am
As a matter of principle this is now the only real test”. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 1:00 am
The examining division held the subject-matter of claims 1 and 2 of the set of claims filed with letter dated 7 August 2015 "to be within the exception to patentability Article 53(b) EPC and Rule 28(2) EPC" and refused the application.III. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 5:01 pm
As a rule, the Boards admit amendments when they are filed in response to objections or evidence that are not part of the impugned decision but have been submitted for the first time in the course of the appeal proceedings. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 6:01 pm
That purpose is served, the state insists, whether the vote is unanimous or is instead 11-1 or 10-2 – as demonstrated by the fact that most countries (including England) that use jury trials do not require unanimous verdicts. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 3:52 am
Moreover, the adopting release does not indicate (1) whether the amendments should be applied only to periodic reports covering periods ending on or after the effective date, or (2) whether the amendments should be applied to all periodic reports filed after the effective date. [read post]
