Search for: "Jason Mazzone"
Results 201 - 220
of 235
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2012, 4:40 pm
Jason Mazzone, Jonathan Askin, and I are eagerly working to have Perry come to campus, both to present Paramount’s perspective and to discuss it with him. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 6:37 am
- In a guest post for ACSblog, William Yeomans argues for an “enforceable code of conduct” for the Justices, while at Jason Mazzone of Balkinization considers the unintended consequences of such ethics rules. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 6:41 am
At Balkinization, Jason Mazzone suggests that “Judge Hudson’s opinion is written for Justice Scalia,” and that, “once read in light of Scalia’s concurring opinion in [Gonzales v.] [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 1:43 pm
For more on the handling of the Necessary & Proper Clause in this case, I recommend these posts outlining the views of Jason Mazzone, Kurt Lash, and Randy Barnett. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 4:40 pm
Jason Mazzone, Jonathan Askin, and I are eagerly working to have Perry come to campus, both to present Paramount’s perspective and to discuss it with him. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 12:42 pm
Moreover, The Obama Administration now takes the position that legislation like that in DOMA, which discriminates on the basis of sexual orientation, should be subjected to heightened scrutiny, rather than rational basis scrutiny.As Jason Mazzone points out, Holder has also said in a letter to the Speaker of the House that in those circuits that hold as a matter of precedent that the rational basis test applies to distinctions based on sexual orientation, the Justice… [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 7:18 am
Addendum: Over at Balkinization, Jason Mazzone and Jack Balkin debate the meaning of the Guarantee Clause and its relevance to OWS – here, here, and here. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 10:34 am
Even so, a few reactions to the story have been thoughtful and have even used the controversy to make good points, such as my Verdict colleagues Vik Amar and Jason Mazzone's piece earlier this week (the first of a two-parter, with the second part not yet published), in which they commit the unpardonable sin of observing that "shouting down" a speaker is actually a nuanced issue.I use the sarcastic phrasing "unpardonable sin" because the standard… [read post]
5 May 2013, 9:33 am
Kiel Brennan-Marquez, Reynolds v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:01 pm
That is why Jason and I urged the Court to immediately grant review in a case from Ohio—Huffman v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
In two of my last three Verdict columns (this one and then this one co-authored with Jason Mazzone), I have discussed—in connection with the Supreme Court’s consideration in Trump v. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 2:57 am
In contrast, consider the mouse-milking** argument proffered by Jason Mazzone at Balkinization, that Segal referred to criminal procedure rather than criminal law class, teaching "common law crimes" rather than the model penal code, all of which lawyers, lawprofs and even law students recognize as mistaken details that are inconsequential to the point of the article. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 6:29 pm
Our commentator, Jason Mazzone, encouraged Bartholomew to explore the unfinished story of the right of publicity—pointing out that while it has gotten more powerful in recent years, it still remains far less developed, as a property right than other areas of intangible goods, exhorting Bartholomew to explore further why it has lagged behind others. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 9:55 am
La conferencia fue ofrecida por el Profesor Jason Mazzone, de Brooklyn Law School, quien figura como una de las autoridades emergentes más relevantes en el tema. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 6:34 am
” The Volokh Conspiracy’s John Elwood, Balkinization’s Jason Mazzone, ABA Journal’s Debra Weiss, and the WSJ Law Blog’s Nathan Koppel all point out that the Court is especially critical of the Ninth Circuit in Harrington: Justice Kennedy characterizes Judge Reinhardt’s opinion as exhibiting “judicial disregard for the sound and established principles that inform [the] proper issuance” of the writ. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 6:24 am
” At Balkinization, Jason Mazzone writes that even though the respondent, Fred Phelps, is “the least likeable party in all of First Amendment jurisprudence,” Phelps “will [probably] win because even if the Court is inclined to apply lesser First Amendment protections to funeral protests, this is the wrong case for the Court to do it. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm
As I and two colleagues (Jason Mazzone and Evan Caminker) explained in a series of columns (the last of which—that in turn links back to earlier parts—is here), the challenge to Obamacare in California v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 1:35 pm
.), I think this is an exciting development, for all the reasons that Jason Mazzone laid out nicely last year at Balkinization. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 6:34 am
” The Volokh Conspiracy’s John Elwood, Balkinization’s Jason Mazzone, ABA Journal’s Debra Weiss, and the WSJ Law Blog’s Nathan Koppel all point out that the Court is especially critical of the Ninth Circuit in Harrington: Justice Kennedy characterizes Judge Reinhardt’s opinion as exhibiting “judicial disregard for the sound and established principles that inform [the] proper issuance” of the writ. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 11:01 pm
But it also means that a loss in the Supreme Court could be much more narrow, potentially rejecting only what Jason Mazzone has quite persuasively argued is a strained reading of Romer. [read post]
