Search for: "Kahn v. Kahn" Results 201 - 220 of 795
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2011, 3:52 am
COBRA notifications must be sent to eligible individuals by employerPhillips v Saratoga Harness Racing Inc., USDC, NDNY, 240 F.3d 174 U.S. [read post]
2 Jun 2018, 10:35 am by Rachel Bercovitz
Jeffrey Kahn summarized the May 23 oral argument in Georgia v. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 3:36 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The plaintiff and his wife held title to the subject property as tenants by the entirety and were, thus, each seized of the whole property (see Kahn v Kahn, 43 NY2d 203, 206-207; Stelz v Shreck, 128 NY 263, 266; Paterno v CYC, LLC, 46 AD3d 788, 789). [read post]
27 May 2015, 8:36 pm by Anthony McCain
: Rihanna’s “Robyn” Registration Opposed by DC Comic Doug Schoen : The Patent Process in America is Broken Joe Mullin: “Copyright trolling” Movie Studio gets hit with Godzilla-Sized Lawsuit Michael Borella : Allvoice  v. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
(Rocky) Rhodes, Solving the Procedural Puzzles of the Texas Heartbeat Act and its Imitators: New York Times v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 12:16 pm by Stephanie Zable
Grayson Clary summarized the circuit split as to the legality of border searches, focusing on US v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
From SSRN:Avishalom Westreich, Assisted Reproduction in Israel: Law, Religion, and Culture, (Brill Research Perspectives: Family law in a Global Society, 2018).Steven Douglas Smith, The Case of the Exemption Claimants: Religion, Conscience, and Identity, (San Diego Legal Studies Paper No. 18-345, 2018).Sidney Martin, Oklahoma's 'Bone-Dry' Law and the Fallacy of Legislative Accommodation Under Employment Division v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 6:19 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
In this case, the plaintiff loses after claiming a religious exemption to a COVID vaccination mandate.The case is D'Cunha v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 11:14 am by Coleman Saunders
Margaret Taylor summarized the oral arguments from Trump v. [read post]
July 13, 2020) This case illustrates that the Court of Chancery will apply the entire fairness standard to review a squeeze-out merger by a controller, if the controller engages in substantive economic discussions before the company has enacted the procedural protections outlined in Kahn v. [read post]