Search for: "Labelle v. State" Results 201 - 220 of 8,151
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2016, 1:34 pm by Lisa Baird and Gillian Clow
The parties’ March 8, 2016 proposed order of settlement includes the following provisions: Defendants agree to be bound by the Court’s conclusion that Amarin may engage in truthful and non-misleading speech promoting the off-label use of Vascepa and, under United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 8:03 am
Levine, the Supreme Court held, 6-3, that federal approval of warnings on prescription drug labels does not preempt state law tort suits alleging that such... [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 7:46 am by lcampbell@lawbc.com
“Product label claims generally considered ‘non-pesticidal’ (i.e. non-plant regulator claims),” including:  “plant nutrition-based claims” (Table 1a); “plant inoculant-based claims” (Table 1b); and “soil amendment-based claims” (Table 1c): “Generic product label claims for products not covered by the exclusions in the FIFRA Section 2(v) definition of a plant regulator,” including “examples… [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 5:32 am
”  Brief of United States, United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 1:37 pm by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Judge Laplante saw through the drug companies’ shell games and got it exactly right in Bartlett v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 8:37 am
The court holds that a state tort jury, rather than the Food and Drug Administration, is ultimately responsible for regulating warning labels for prescription drugs. [read post]
21 May 2024, 2:45 am by Rebecca Daramola (Bristows)
It stated that the documents of the EPO examination proceedings cited by the parties shed no new light on its interpretation. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 10:02 am
Brennan, holding that the RIAA complaint fails to state a claim.February 25, 2008, Letter of Ray Beckerman to Hon. [read post]