Search for: "Marty Lederman"
Results 201 - 220
of 593
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2007, 8:21 pm
Via Marty Lederman and scotusblog, the Congressional Research Service has just issued a comprehensive report on the Congress' contempt power. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 3:42 am
At Just Security, Marty Lederman adds to his analysis of the decision with parts five, six, and seven of his series; Marty also discusses the case in a podcast with Jack Goldsmith at Lawfare. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 1:54 pm
As Marty Lederman notes, on August 2, there will be marriage equality in D.C. and 13 states--California, Connecticut, Delaware, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota (where a new law takes effect August 1), New Hampshire, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 5:17 pm
In a comment, Marty Lederman expressed his view: The big question here is not the War Powers Resolution, but the Constitution. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 6:19 am
" In that post over at the Balkinization blog, Georgetown's Marty Lederman wrote that although he was "horrified by what DOJ approved and what the CIA has done" - that is, the subjection of so-called high-value detainees to simulated suffocation in the course of interrogation - he does not "find it so surprising, or objectionable, that DOJ would not think of prosecuting the CIA operatives and contractors, even though" Marty's been a… [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 3:11 am
” Other coverage of Moore’s actions comes from Mike Cason of Al.com; commentary comes from Marty Lederman at Balkinization and Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 6:51 pm
Anderson)”: Marty Lederman has this post at the “Balkinization” blog. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 8:48 am
[Thanks to Marty Lederman via Religionlaw for the lead.] [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 8:25 am
" And in commentary, at "Just Security," Marty Lederman has a blog post titled "The President Resuscitates the Entry Ban: Where Should the Court Go From Here? [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 9:12 am
” Marty Lederman had this pre-cert. grant post at the “Lawfare” blog. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 7:40 am
" And at the "Just Security" blog, Marty Lederman has a post titled "Judge Chutkan's Ruling on the Unidentified U.S. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:48 pm
By Marty Lederman and Steve Vladeck* [Cross-posted at OpinioJuris] Section 1021 of the NDAA and the Laws of War In our companion post, we explained that section 1021 of the NDAA will not have the dramatic effects that many critics have predicted–in particular, that it will not affect the unresolved question of whether the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) would authorize a future President to place a U.S citizen or resident who is apprehended in the… [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 3:41 pm
(Eugene Volokh) Marty Lederman (Balkinization) blogs about an indictment that raises very important First Amendment issues. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 6:49 am
Marty Lederman and Steve Vladeck provide a comprehensive analysis at Opinio Juris (Part I is here and Part II here). [read post]
25 May 2011, 10:05 am
In addition to Marty Lederman's post on the bin Laden targeting below (great to have him back in the blogosphere!) [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:32 am
At this blog, Marty Lederman discusses the impact of last week’s decision in United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:51 am
Marty Lederman has a series of four posts on the case at Just Security, where he discusses “the Chief Justice’s dissenting opinion, and the question of whether, and to what extent, Zivotofsky is a departure from the Court’s historical jurisprudence”; whether and how Menachem Zivotofsky had standing to bring his lawsuit; the “three important propositions” on which eight of the nine Justices actually agreed; and Justice Thomas’s… [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 3:58 pm
In today's Wall Street Journal, Jess Bravin has this front page article (subscription req'd) on the shift toward limited access and judicial restraint; Linda Greenhouse had this in-depth piece discussing key rulings, reviewing the Term and describing "the Supreme Court that conservatives had long yearned for and that liberals feared" in yesterday's New York Times; Marty Lederman responds to her article (and notes a few exceptions) here at Balkinization. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 7:56 pm
And think of this, as reported by Marty Lederman: [A]t the Senate Judiciary hearing this week, Senator Durbin . . . asked the AG, in particular, whether it would be legal for a foreign government to subject nonuniformed U.S. personnel to five particular interrogation techniques -- "painful stress positions, threatening detainees with dogs, forced nudity, waterboarding and mock execution. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 3:58 am
At Balkinization, Marty Lederman takes a close look at last week’s cert petition in Hargan v. [read post]
