Search for: "Matter of Mark T." Results 201 - 220 of 16,344
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2024, 5:55 am by Tess Bridgeman
Goldston (@JamesAGoldston) (January 31, 2024) Why the ICJ Ruling Misses the Mark: Mitigating Civilian Harm With An Enemy Engaged in Human Shielding By Claire O. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 4:08 am by Chris Seaton
If you think of anything else relevant to this matter you call me directly at the station, okay? [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 6:48 am by Kal Raustiala
(Indeed, in a marked contrast to contemporary peacekeeping, Bunche later said UNEF was so popular he couldn’t use “half the troops that were offered. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 1:34 pm
Which I'd care more about if it mattered, which, again, it doesn't much at this point.) [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  We also examined that this "old" conception is of little use in describing and thinking about the "new constitutional times", marked by strong democratic expectations and demands. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 3:59 am by jonathanturley
” She also noted that actors like StarWars star Mark Hamill posted a comparison of Trump with the Nazis in a September 18, 2022 posting. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:52 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
The Senate could simply refer the matter to a committee for its own investigation, delaying immediate action. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 9:00 am by NP Analytics
Capture relevant details, such as road signs and markings. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 5:42 am by Jon Hyman
No matter how good intentioned an employer might be, if you take race or gender into account in hiring or retaining employees, you've violated Title VII. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 10:06 am by Kevin LaCroix
” Specifically, the court found that “[t]he claims all arose out of SPCA’s alleged continuous harassing and discriminatory conduct and retaliation for the [underlying plaintiff’s] 2007 [complaint against SPCA]. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm by Marty Lederman
Part II of Donald Trump’s brief argues that the factual predicate for the Colorado Supreme Court’s decision to remove Trump’s name from the primary ballot was absent because Trump did not “engage in” an insurrection against the United States on January 6, 2021.[1]  [Apologies in advance about all the footnotes, but I didn't want to clutter the text with too many peripheral matters.]The Colorado Supreme Court held that Trump’s words… [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 4:54 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Are they having trouble clearing marks? [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 2:59 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
” Argument for change to factor 4, that growing a market/market benefits should matter. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 10:59 am by Rebecca Tushnet
It’s often not rational to read the contract, since most terms won’t end up mattering. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
 I’ve marked in boldface, and labeled as [1] and [2], the two separate clauses of Section 3 that identify particular officers and other government officials. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 2:56 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Potential liability years downstream if that doesn’t matter. [read post]