Search for: "National Association of Manufacturers. v. Department of Defense"
Results 201 - 220
of 339
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2015, 12:07 pm
Since violation of these out-of-pocket maximums (as well as many other federal health benefit rules) can trigger an obligation for the employer to self-assess, self-report by filing a Form IRS Form 8928, and pay excise taxes of up to $100 per day, as well as expose the plan and its fiduciaries to ERISA lawsuits from covered persons, the Department of Labor or both, insurers and administrators also should review their group health plan provisions and their administration in operation to… [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:35 pm
Historically, the property had been the site of a chemical manufacturing plant operated by Maryland Chemical Company. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
Department of Agriculture. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 10:57 am
The Defense Department Inspector General is investigating the possibility of carcinogens located near the Department of Defense's Military Commissions site at Guantanamo. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 8:05 am
Stamer is recognized nationally and internationally for her practical and creative insights and leadership on HIPAA and other health and other employee benefit, human resources, and related insurance, health care, privacy and data security and tax matters and policy. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 11:56 am
As implemented by current Department of Labor Regulations, these ACA claims and appeals procedures require that group health plans (other than grandfathered plans) both comply with: All of the pre-existing ERISA claims and appeals rules; and Notify members or their beneficiaries of their rights to and provide for independent review of coverage rescission decisions and medical judgment-based claims denials in accordance with detailed rules set forth in the Labor… [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 10:44 am
No. 11-440 (RJL), 2012 WL 3542228 (Aug. 1, 2012). [8] Lorillard, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2015, 2:14 pm
In the face of these developments, health plans and their employer or other sponsors, health plan fiduciaries, health plan vendors acting as business associates and others dealing with health plans and their management should contact legal counsel experienced in these matters for advice and help about evaluating within the scope of attorney-client privilege the implications of the Resolution Agreement and other recent guidance on the adequacy and defensibility of their and their… [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:43 pm
Department of Labor Wage and Hour Division (WHD) implements a Proposed Fair Labor Standards Act Rule Change (Proposed Rule) that would extend overtime pay rights to nearly 5 million additional workers by guaranteeing overtime pay to most salaried workers earning less than an estimated $50,440 next year. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 10:53 am
With the Obama Administration construing the United States Supreme Court’s King v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:25 pm
Since the Supreme Court ruled that the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution entitled same-sex couples to equal treatment with married heterosexual couples under federal law in United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:02 pm
With the Supreme Court’s much anticipated June 25, 2015 King v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 10:53 am
Paul discussed the Supreme Court’s decision in City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:04 pm
Schulhofer and its associate reporter, Erin E. [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:28 am
”The most useful part of the article, from our perspective as defense lawyers, is the discussion of current medical and legal doctrines. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 8:55 am
EPA; National Mining Association v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:28 pm
Defense Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 20 (2008)). [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 7:38 am
To the contrary, Warden says the Defense Department has provided high quality medical care to Dhiab; there is no factual or legal basis to upend the medical judgments of Guantanamo personnel. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 7:34 am
The name of the task force refers to the Supreme Court case Brady v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:00 am
Primus’ position, from day one of this litigation, has been to spare no expense in spending down its burning limits policy in total defense of its reputation[10]. [read post]
