Search for: "North Dakota v. Minnesota" Results 201 - 220 of 305
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2013, 4:30 am by Guest Blogger
  See Planned Parenthood Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota v. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 2:38 am by Russell Beck
” Missouri: Choice of law provision selecting Missouri (where plaintiff was located) over Oklahoma (which like California and North Dakota, bars employee noncompetes and where defendants were located and where most of the conduct occurred) was enforced by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri in TLC Vision (USA) Corp. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 7:51 am by Bryan Fears
Eighth Circuit courts are historically conservative, comprising the Midwest states of Arkansas, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, and South Dakota. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 1:50 pm by Bexis
App. 1991) (“[a] hospital that utilizes an alleged defective product only in the course of its primary function of providing medical services is not subject to an action of strict liability where the professional services could not have been rendered without using the product”); North Miami General Hospital, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Robin E. Shea
*The Eighth Circuit hears appeals from federal district courts in Arkansas, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, and South Dakota. [read post]
11 Aug 2012, 12:22 am
Ready Pac said the products containing the apples were shipped to Alabama, Arkansas, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Iowa, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Vermont, Virginia, Wisconsin and West… [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 11:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
   The EEOC Chicago District Office is responsible for processing charges of discrimination, administrative enforcement, and the conduct of agency litigation in Illinois, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa, and North and South Dakota, with Area Offices in Milwaukee and Minneapolis. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 8:41 am
Fifteen other states have opted out of the Medicare requirement requiring CNRAs to be supervised by a physician while administering anesthesia: Washington, Oregon, Iowa, Nebraska, Idaho, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Kansas, North Dakota, Alaska, Montana, South Dakota, Wisconsin, and Colorado. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
The court chose not to follow contrary decisions in Illinois, Minnesota, New Jersey, Ohio, and North Dakota. [read post]
23 May 2012, 2:24 pm by Kim Zetter
Circuit courts in the 7th (covering Illinois, Wisconsin and Indiana), 8th (covering Arkansas, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota and South Dakota) and 9th (covering Alaska, Arizona, California, Guam, Hawaii, Idaho, the Mariana Islands, Montana, Nevada, Oregon and Washington) all ruled prior to the Supreme Court case that warrantless GPS tracking was legal. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 9:37 am by Lorene Park
States with these types of laws include Alaska, Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Minnesota, Mississippi, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Texas, Utah, and Wisconsin. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 3:30 am by Kim Zetter
" Circuit courts in the 7th (covering Illinois, Wisconsin and Indiana), 8th (covering Arkansas, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota and South Dakota) and 9th (covering Alaska, Arizona, California, Guam, Hawaii, Idaho, the Mariana Islands, Montana, Nevada, Oregon and Washington) all ruled prior to the Supreme Court case that warrantless GPS tracking was legal. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 8:02 pm by Diversity Insight
Circuit Court of Appeals (which covers Arkansas, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, and South Dakota) explained what constitutes unlawful “political discrimination” and how state employers can prevent it, particularly in a politically charged election year. [read post]