Search for: "Owen v. United States" Results 201 - 220 of 469
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2010, 1:07 pm by Gene Quinn
Microsoft case will recall that on August 11, 2009, the United States District Court Judge in the Eastern District of Texas issued a final order in the matter of i4i v. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 11:38 am by Sarah Grant, Jack Goldsmith
  The WPR Letter’s Listed Countries and Regions Below we list the countries where, according to the WPR letter, “the United States has deployed United States combat-equipped forces to conduct counterterrorism operations and to advise, assist, and accompany security forces of select foreign partners on counterterrorism operations. [read post]
21 May 2017, 9:36 am by Steve Kalar
  Happily, the government now gets a second bite at the Brady apple.United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2010, 8:23 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
United States, with introductory note by Eloïse ObadiaInternational Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes: Malaysian Historical Salvors & Phoenix Action, Ltd. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 8:31 am by Maureen Johnston
Kerry 13-628Issue: Whether a federal statute that directs the Secretary of State, on request, to record the birthplace of an American citizen born in Jerusalem as born in "Israel" on a Consular Report of Birth Abroad and on a United States passport is unconstitutional on the ground that the statute "impermissibly infringes on the President's exercise of the recognition power reposing exclusively in him." [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 11:14 am by Aaron
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2010/11/15/08-30360.pdf United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 9:19 am by Aaron
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2010/11/08/08-10167.pdf United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:34 am
” [Grievant] was entitled to, “...all the rights and privileges guaranteed by the laws of the State of Oklahoma and the Constitution of the United States of America. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 5:21 pm
  Like the Third Circuit, we hold that section 7 does not enable arbitrators to issue pre-hearing document subpoenas to entities not parties to the arbitration proceeding, and therefore reverse the order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Owen, J.). [read post]