Search for: "People v. Hill" Results 201 - 220 of 1,562
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2014, 10:29 am
The landowner's actions relying on a valid permit must be so substantial that the municipal action results in serious loss rendering the improvements essentially valueless" (Town of Orangetown v Magee, 88 NY2d at 47-48; see Glacial Aggregates LLC v Town of Yorkshire, 14 NY3d at 136; People v Miller, 304 NY at 109; Matter of RC Enters. v Town of Patterson, 42 AD3d at 544; People ex rel. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 4:44 pm by Stuart Buck
After all, didn't the Supreme Court uphold speech restrictions outside abortion clinics in the case of Hill v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 12:00 am
We're a city on a hill, a shining beacon to the world, right? [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 7:33 am
I am sure that the Blogosphere will be blogging about this op-ed by Judge Morris Hoffman, who conducted an empirical study which analyzed sentences handed out to people represented by public defenders v. privately retained counsel. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 9:53 am by Nasir Pasha, Esq.
At the end of each day, Quickly keeps all the fares from the people he picked up during the day. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 12:15 pm by Kevin
Approximately Thirteen Unoccupied Burial Plots Situated at Forest Lawn Memorial Park’s Hollywood Hills Cemetery Located in Los Angeles, California. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 3:08 am by Barbara E. Lichman, Ph.D., J.D.
Because the Federal Aviation Administration’s (“FAA’) airspace redesign projects throughout the United States have apparently negatively impacted hundreds of thousands, even millions, of people, and because we have received a number of requests for a discussion of the bases for the currently pending challenge to the FAA’s SoCal Metroplex airspace redesign project, a copy of the Opening Brief of Petitioners City of Culver City, California; Santa Monica Canyon Civic… [read post]
4 May 2007, 8:16 am
This was the issue before the Third Department yesterday in People v Cabrera, 2007 NY Slip Op 03798. [read post]
7 Mar 2010, 4:00 pm by James Eckert
Please join me as we take a trip deep into the weeds.Fact - the People are required to serve a 710.30 notice when they intend to use statements of the defendant, which meet other criteria which will not be enumerated here.Fact - Sometimes the People do not serve a 710.30 notice as to some or all statements meeting those criteria.Fact - The Appellate Division, Fourth Department, has ruled that using such statements for the purpose of impeachment is perfectly okay even so… [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 4:15 am
" Hill himself was later convicted and executed for committing what he and some of his followers considered "justifiable homicide. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 9:34 am by Steven M. Gursten
We have offices in Farmington Hills, Detroit, Ann Arbor, Grand Rapids and Sterling Heights to better serve you. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
DonovanRethinking People v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 7:45 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Mitchell II: 76 percent to 24 percent Proves once again that people just don’t like paying taxes. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 1:12 pm by Eugene Volokh
Hill (1987) ("the First Amendment protects a significant amount of verbal criticism and challenge directed at police officers"); United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2012, 8:47 am by Ziv Steinberg
A decade ago, the Supreme Court ruled that it is unconstitutional to execute people with mental retardation in Atkins v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 7:08 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Texas Insurance Code, Section 541.453, makes clear this principle also, citing, Waite Hill Services, Inc. v. [read post]