Search for: "People v Person"
Results 201 - 220
of 31,524
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2012, 12:27 am
Those of us who take the Fourth Amendment seriously, with its "right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects" from search and seizure, were dismayed by the Supreme Court's recent ruling in Florence v. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 2:35 pm
Juror John V. himself was convicted of DUI by plea. . . . [read post]
21 Nov 2009, 1:36 pm
Thursday we began a series on the Second Circuit of Court of Appeals decision in United States v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 5:56 am
People v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 1:34 pm
People v Kelly Court Discusses a Defendant’s Confrontation Rights Regarding Breathalyzer Machines The Defendant was arrested of driving under the influence after the arresting officer observed his erratic behavior including swerving and nearly striking the traffic delineators. [read post]
3 Jul 2010, 7:39 am
The Federal case out of the Western District of Wisconsin, styled, Allen v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 1:12 pm
.' He went on to explain that the 'bombers are the people who direct the incident away from the person who actually did the stabbing and cutting,' allowing the prisoners with weapons, called 'hitters,' to get away while the bombers continue to attack the victim without weapons. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 3:07 pm
Here are some of the presumptively invalid reasons under CCP 231.7(e): (1) Expressing a distrust of or having a negative experience with law enforcement or the criminal legal system.(2) Expressing a belief that law enforcement officers engage in racial profiling or that criminal laws have been enforced in a discriminatory manner.(3) Having a close relationship with people who have been stopped, arrested, or convicted of a crime.(4) A prospective juror's neighborhood.(5)… [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 4:31 pm
For example, we exclude lots of truthful evidence when there's a violation of Miranda, and I personally think that opinion advances the interests of justice. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 12:56 pm
.' (People v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 2:03 pm
My personal answer is: No. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 11:45 am
(People v. [read post]
8 Dec 2019, 11:17 am
In People v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 12:46 pm
The problem with such evidence, photographs or videos that do not have a person that took the photograph or video to authenticate it, is that the evidentiary foundation required for a photo or video to be entered in to evidence is that the person that took the photo or video would need to testify as to what exactly the photo or video represents and when it was taken.As the video camera in this case was a motion activated camera that was installed in a high school, there is no… [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 9:11 am
See, e.g., People v. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 12:09 pm
Today, I discuss the seminal California Supreme Court premises liability case of Rowland v. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 10:56 am
People who file lawsuits need to be aware of the discovery rules as shown by Du-All Safety, LLC v. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 4:35 am
” Carlisle v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 10:00 am
” (Higgins v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 12:07 pm
Now imagine that the person told you that nothing you said in the book would matter. [read post]
