Search for: "People v. Kelly"
Results 201 - 220
of 848
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2008, 1:37 am
Kelly, however, had been convicted of two counts of grand larceny for theft of school property prior to being charged under Section 3020-a [People v Kelly, 72 AD2d 670]. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 12:05 pm
These people will say ANYTHING. [read post]
25 May 2012, 2:12 pm
In People v Buie, the Michigan Supreme Court held that expert testimony by two-way video did not violate the defendant’s right of confrontation because the defendant’s counsel waived that right. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:45 am
Lynn Jordan, Kelly IP, amicus counsel for the Motion Picture Association in MFGB Properties v. [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 6:28 am
” Lawson v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 1:42 pm
Likine, No. 141154, People v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 11:27 am
In People v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 10:41 am
Cardozo ; an unappealing model of a hairy hand inspired by Hawkins v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 6:20 am
Additional Resources: Pasquale v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 6:20 am
Additional Resources: Pasquale v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 6:30 am
"The opinion does set forth that the county has regularly had a policy of accommodating people with on-the-job injuries and not off-the-job injuries and even at the trial, the county can present that position," Kelly said. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 5:06 am
In National Assn of Broadcasters v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 6:01 am
She explained that she does not agreed with the standardized test for stare decisis in Chief Justice Kelly’s opinion in Peterson v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 7:45 am
On June 22, the Court also decided People v Henix, No 144531. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 1:42 am
People v. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 12:26 pm
KAM Transport, Inc and in People v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 10:31 am
Kelly Fischer had a problem. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 9:40 am
People v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 4:08 pm
But in Dolemba v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 3:51 am
Here are the facts in last week’s 8th District decision in Middleburg Heights v. [read post]
