Search for: "People v. Wells (1970)" Results 201 - 220 of 1,125
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2020, 11:23 am by rainey Reitman
Dunkins (EFF) New Federal Court Rulings Find Geofence Warrants Unconstitutional (EFF) EFF Files Amicus Brief Arguing Geofence Warrants Violate the Fourth Amendment (Ongoing case of People v Dawes in SF Superior Court re geofence warrants)  People v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 4:00 am by Euan Sinclair
For an example, look no further than the celebrated Costeja v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 6:23 am by Randy Barnhart
Sax, The Public Trust Doctrine in Natural Resource Law: Effective Judicial Intervention, 68 Mich.L.Rev. 471 (1970); Stevens, The Public Trust: A Sovereign's Ancient Prerogative Becomes the People's Environmental Right, 14 U.C.Davis L.Rev. 195 (1980). [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 4:35 am by JB
Consider this: in 1791 black people were held in slavery. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 3:10 am by Eric S. Solotoff
In this case, the parties met in high school in the 1950s and married other people, but commenced a relationship in the 1970s after the end of their respective marriages. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 10:48 am by NFS Esq.
Rapid Transit Dist. (1970) 2 Cal.3d 1, 6 (Helfend)), ensures that plaintiff here may recover in damages the amounts her insurer paid for her medical care. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 5:19 am by Alfred Brophy
  Jim Crow separated people intellectually, as well as physically and socially. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 7:54 am by Lovechilde
Mitt Romney recently claimed that corporations are people too, but it was Lewis Powell, the courtly gentleman from Virginia, who devised a plan 40 years ago to put the rights of corporations above those of the people. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410 (2006), and Lane v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 11:14 am by Priscilla Smith
The government cannot penalize people for exercising their constitutional rights, and Roe v. [read post]
25 Oct 2006, 6:04 am
That argument hasn't flown as well, in part because it requires that girls' educational interests be sacrificed to boys' interests, which, of course, reminds people of pretty standard forms of sex inequality practiced over the centuries. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 4:29 pm by Gideon
Well, I cautioned people way back when that the Amendment merely spoke to the age at which a person could hold statewide office and did nothing to change the requirement that someone who was AG had to be a lawyer. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 4:17 pm by Mark Walsh
Well, we’re ready,” Roberts replies. [read post]