Search for: "Peoples v. State" Results 201 - 220 of 50,477
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2024, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
In particular he complained that the national courts interpreted his statements – which he claims were critical remarks on numerous topical issues – as being extremist and insulting towards people of faith. [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 2:23 pm by Eugene Volokh
["[M]uch of [the Oregon State Bar statement's] criticism of then-President Trump did not relate to the justice system at all—for instance, it criticized Trump for describing Haiti and African countries as 'shithole countries.'"] From Ninth Circuit Judge Michelle Friedland's opinion today in Crowe v. [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 12:05 pm by ACLU
The ACLU will push a Harris administration to rein in uses of surveillance that discriminate against people in the United States or invade their privacy. [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 8:07 am
I understand that different people -- and different cultures -- may have varying approaches to the issue.Nonetheless, personally, I wouldn't want to be the individual remembered by history as one who filed a federal lawsuit and fought hard in an attempt to make cockfighting legal in the Commonwealth of the Northern Marianas Islands.Particularly since he loses. [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 6:05 am by Edgar Chen
Yes Trump has been arrested and charged in four state and federal cases, three of which* are still pending: New York v. [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 4:09 am by SHG
The lead case on this issue is Eastex, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Despite a lack of evidence that abortion regret was a widespread phenomenon, Justice Kennedy's majority opinion in Gonzales v. [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 3:00 am by jonathanturley
When the censorship system was recently put before the Supreme Court in Murthy v. [read post]
27 Aug 2024, 8:26 am by Reference Staff
National ArchivesNotably, the 1924 law kept in place the “Asiatic Barred Zone” and denied entry to those who were ineligible for citizenship, effectively continuing the ban of most people of Asian descent, and shutting the door on Japanese immigrants. [read post]
27 Aug 2024, 8:12 am by Hannah Zhao
Indeed, six months after Ciraolo was decided, the California Supreme Court held in People v. [read post]