Search for: "Power v. California Bank"
Results 201 - 220
of 792
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2018, 3:45 am
Supreme Court over his right to shut out the public” from a path across his property to the beach, and that his challenge to the California Coastal Act, if successful, “would put into question long-established land use procedures and any state’s power to regulate development anywhere. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 5:15 am
Justice Sonia Sotomayor was in California. [read post]
18 Dec 2024, 9:30 am
(Brown v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 1:46 pm
AT&T, 131 S.Ct. at 1746 (quoting Discover Bank v. [read post]
Quiet Title & the Staute of Limitations – When is a Plaintiff in Undisturbed Possession of the Land?
2 Jun 2020, 8:30 am
In Huang v Wells Fargo Bank, Wells Fargo held two letters of credit (home equity loans) that had been paid off in a refinance. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 7:35 am
Now California may be moving in that direction. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 1:26 pm
Smagin and CMB Monaco v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 7:29 am
In Discover Bank, the California Supreme Court had interpreted California’s unconscionability statute to invalidate most class arbitration waivers in consumer contracts because they effectively exempted the party with superior bargaining power from responsibility for “cheat[ing] large numbers of consumers out of individually small sums of money. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 6:00 am
Sovereign Bank, 386 Md. 412, 430 (2005) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
1 Jun 2019, 8:42 pm
City Nat’l Bank, 592 F.2d 504, 507 (1978). [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 10:27 am
I bolded my favorite part because that I think it perfectly encapsulates most privacy lawsuits: the class action lawyers see money in the defendant’s bank account and they want to move it into their bank accounts. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 7:23 am
ANSWER: Bank-owned units count toward the total voting power of the association. [read post]
17 May 2011, 1:32 pm
In Discover Bank, the California Supreme Court held that collective-action waivers are unenforceable when included in contracts of adhesion and where “it is alleged that the party with the superior bargaining power has carried out a scheme to deliberately cheat large numbers of consumers out of individually small sums of money. [read post]
24 May 2010, 12:06 pm
See Kaplan v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:16 pm
Consider the Court’s 1978 decision in Bakke (Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 12:56 pm
California, 496 U.S. 128, 136 (1990) (quoting Coolidge v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 10:26 am
When a 2005 California Supreme Court decision held that an arbitration clause that included a class action waiver in a consumer contract was unconscionable, Discover Bank v. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 11:58 am
Peterson — whether Congress violated the constitutional separation of powers by requiring the turnover of U.S. assets of Iran’s central banks to victims of terrorist acts, when that was at issue in a pending court case Puerto Rico v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm
In a similar case, California refused to place the name of a 27-year-old presidential candidate on its primary election ballot, and the U.S. [read post]
