Search for: "Price v. Phillips"
Results 201 - 220
of 339
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2020, 9:58 am
The price in effect may be changed annually. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 1:20 am
” Modis, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 12:04 am
It looks like they would also do away with all the problems of the “threshold” requirement introduced by Phillips v Mirabella (the nature of the problem is laid out at paragraphs 19 to 27 of Bristol-Myers Squibb v Faulding). [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 7:36 am
Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 4:11 am
” At The Federalist Society Review, Richard Raile argues that last term’s decision in partisan-gerrymandering case Gill v. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 9:51 pm
This year the conference organisers, CLT, have been persuaded by sponsoring weblog Fashionista at Law to make a special "two places for the price of one" admission deal. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 5:46 am
(IP Dragon) Denmark Denmark’s new transfer pricing IP valuation guideline (IP finance) Europe ECJ: COLOR EDITION – the A-G delivers his opinion on the application by Lâncome: Lancôme v OHIM and CMS Hasche Sigle (Class 46) ECJ: Diesel ruling affirms that exhausting still trumps trademarks, but consent must be unequivocal: Makro Zelfbedieningsgroothandel CV, Metro Cash & Carry BV and Remo Zaandam BV v… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
(IP Dragon) Denmark Denmark's new transfer pricing IP valuation guideline (IP finance) Europe ECJ: COLOR EDITION - the A-G delivers his opinion on the application by Lâncome: Lancôme v OHIM and CMS Hasche Sigle (Class 46) ECJ: Diesel ruling affirms that exhausting still trumps trademarks, but consent must be unequivocal: Makro Zelfbedieningsgroothandel CV, Metro Cash & Carry BV and Remo Zaandam BV v Diesel SpA (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI: KINDER vs TIMI… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
(IP Dragon) Denmark Denmark's new transfer pricing IP valuation guideline (IP finance) Europe ECJ: COLOR EDITION - the A-G delivers his opinion on the application by Lâncome: Lancôme v OHIM and CMS Hasche Sigle (Class 46) ECJ: Diesel ruling affirms that exhausting still trumps trademarks, but consent must be unequivocal: Makro Zelfbedieningsgroothandel CV, Metro Cash & Carry BV and Remo Zaandam BV v Diesel SpA (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI: KINDER vs TIMI… [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 1:10 pm
” Phillips v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 3:46 am
(citing Phillips Petroleum Co. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 10:55 am
Turning to functionality, Arnold provides a detailed account of the law from Navitaire v EasyJet, Nova v Mazooma and of course SAS v WPL. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 5:34 am
State, supra (quoting Phillips v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 5:47 am
From Gregory v. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 5:13 pm
[11] Hunt v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 10:00 pm
Battle Continues between Attorneys and Client over Attorneys’ Failure to Review Documents: In Price Waicukauski & Riley v. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 7:25 am
Not surprisingly, Commissioners Phillips and Wilson issued strong dissents. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 9:32 pm
Phillips Elecs. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 7:04 am
(Image used with permission) I’m pleased to report that my Scott & Cyan Banister First Amendment Clinic student Ashley Phillips and I just filed an amicus brief last week on behalf of the Cato Institute, in Baker v. [read post]
30 Mar 2013, 3:50 am
So far we have presented this, in the case of legislation, as a general feature of human language; uncertainty at the borderline is the price to be paid for the use of general classifying terms in any form of communication concerning matters of fact. [read post]
