Search for: "Price v. State" Results 201 - 220 of 11,974
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2009, 8:49 am by Daniel Low
The new pricing law essentially restores the law regarding minimum resale pricing to how it existed prior to the Supreme Court's 2007 decision in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 2:35 pm
Supreme Court in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 11:17 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Instead of protecting defendants from the power of the state, these decisions have had the opposite effect: criminal trials are increasingly rare and those defendants who dare to insist on their rights pay a substantial and sometimes brutal price if convicted. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Finally, in the midst of Chinese exclusion, the Supreme Court handed down the most significant citizenship case it ever decided, United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 1:30 am by Peter Mahler
I’ve previously featured on this blog several illustrative fixed price buy-sell lawsuits precipitated by stale or absent certificates of value, including Sullivan v Troser Management, Nimkoff v Central Park Plaza Associates, and DeMatteo v DeMatteo Salvage Co. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 11:35 am by Aimee Hess
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion last year in Waggoner v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 7:02 pm
John Wiley Price and the Dallas County Commissioners Court don't appear fazed by the news, but the Texas Task Force on Indigent Defense today issued a report (pdf) analyzing the Dallas public defender office appellate division and caseloads at the state's largest PD office.Countering Price's critique, the TFID found the appellate division cost the county $72 per hour of billable work compared to the $100 paid to private attorneys. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 10:06 am
This has allowed manufacturers to impose minimum resale prices on retailers, and has been very controversial.Conference participants criticized Leegin's impact on consumers and retailers, and criticized the policy rationale for the decision:Increased Consumer Prices - The American Antitrust Institute provided specific examples of popular toys and baby products whose prices for consumers increased in price by 20 to 40% in the wake of Leegin, available here.FTC… [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 4:10 am by Raj Desai, Matrix
They argued that this was the necessary implication of the finding of the Supreme Court in the case of Munir v Secretary of State [2012] 1 WLR 2192 and Alvi (which were heard together) that the power of the Secretary of State to make or vary the Immigration Rules was wholly statutory and not an exercise of prerogative power: [27]. [read post]