Search for: "Public Citizen v. Department of Justice"
Results 201 - 220
of 1,812
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2011, 10:48 am
Department of State referred to the Justice Department’s complaint in United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
Taft, The Religious Convictions of an American Citizen (1916) William H. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 2:44 pm
In the skit, the Justice heard arguments in the case of Baby Bear v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 5:36 am
" But, Bamzai writes, taking an "extreme example," courts would surely not give deference to Department of Justice interpretations in criminal cases. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
In the space below, we analyze an important and interesting decision, Demers v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 9:01 pm
The 4-1 ruling in Chisolm v. [read post]
Case Comment: Hesham Ali (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] UKSC 60 Part One
13 Mar 2017, 2:42 am
It is possible to think of many areas in criminal justice where large swathes of the public may wish to see very draconian laws which are wholly incompatible with fundamental rights in a democratic society. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 8:53 am
Because his lung damage prevented him from performing all of his duties as a state trooper, Torres requested that the Texas Department of Public Safety reemploy him in a different position. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 8:42 am
Holmes wrote: We have seen more than once that the public welfare may call upon the best citizens for their lives. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 5:30 am
Simon LazarusNo less than the Trump administration, Supreme Court pundits felt blind-sided by Chief Justice John Roberts’ rejection, in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 4:00 am
An amicus brief filed with the Supreme Court (at the Court’s request) by the Department of Justice noted that “actuarial risk assessments” had been used in trials since 1923, and the National Center for State Courts favoured their use. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 1:01 am
Supreme Court in Korematsu v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 4:42 am
Frankel concludes that, although it “seems inevitable that the Supreme Court will eventually have to decide the question, . . . first the justices will have to figure out whether Riley’s case or the Justice Department’s (or both) is the best vehicle to clarify the law. [read post]
24 Oct 2009, 3:34 pm
Public, would be providing the primary funding. [read post]
19 Feb 2025, 3:44 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 9:22 am
Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2019.htmlDiné Citizens Against Ruining Our Environment v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
Below is a brief summary of the other two cases before the Court: Department of Agriculture Rural Development Rural Housing Service v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 9:18 am
Co. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2025, 8:24 pm
This new program, called “Catch and Revoke,” is an effort to revoke visas and appears to be a cross-agency collaboration between the State Department, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and the Department of Justice. [read post]
21 May 2019, 4:00 am
In Canada, the Department of Justice Act stipulates that the Attorney General is also the Minister of Justice. [read post]
