Search for: "Rea v. United States" Results 201 - 220 of 516
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2020, 7:00 am by Andrew Hamm
United States 19-795Issue: Whether the principle that criminal statutes must contain a mens rea element, with the exception of strict liability offenses, applies to criminal prosecutions under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, when the underlying statute at issue, 10 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 9:28 am by Randy Barnett
United States, Judge Kavanaugh will be more open to a Fourth Amendment that protects digital records and property. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 7:43 pm by Larkin Reynolds
Raymond Randolph, and Stephen Williams will hear oral argument in Hatim v. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 5:46 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Alliance, with claimsfound obvious:Following a trial for patent infringement that resulted in a hung jury, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California ruled as a matter of law that U.S. [read post]
5 May 2020, 6:17 am by Matt Ramsey
Romag brought a trademark infringement suit in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 6:24 pm by Sophia Cope
In evaluating the sufficiency of the plaintiffs’ complaints on the mens rea element, the Second Circuit cited twin Supreme Court cases, Ashcroft v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 1:57 pm
The dissent stated the State did not prove the confluence of actus reus and mens rea. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 11:02 am by Robert Vrana
[because plaintiff] felt that it would be uncontested that any sales-related activity conducted by REA as to Renesas’ products in the United States would be activity attributable to Renesas. [read post]