Search for: "STATE v. WALLACE"
Results 201 - 220
of 1,008
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2019, 9:30 pm
And, in other news from the FJC, check out the most recent addition to the Center's unit to our Famous Federal Trials series, U.S. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 9:14 am
Tipaldo, minimum-wage laws on the books in a third of the states, in some cases, for decades. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 6:42 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 11:51 am
” Georgia: Stock Redemption Agreement’s “Current Value” Pricing Provision Excludes Minority Discount Wallace v Wallace, 813 S.E.2d 428 [Ct. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 9:45 am
In Wallace v. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 10:37 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 4:39 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 6:06 am
State DA 17-0622 2019 MT 13N Civil – Postconviction State v. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 8:13 am
Under US v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 1:00 pm
United States, the Supreme Court held that most if... [read post]
6 Jan 2019, 8:24 pm
In Wallace v. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 8:03 am
Wallace v. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or recognized… [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or recognized… [read post]
26 Dec 2018, 8:39 am
Turi v. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 2:33 am
Gulati and others v MGN Ltd (2015): the unredacted judgement At the time of the trial’s conclusion, and for three years afterwards, only a redacted version of the judgment was available. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 3:30 am
Kristin Hickman In its 2011 decision in Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research v. [read post]
9 Dec 2018, 8:52 am
” United States v. [read post]
